Search for: "Adams v. New York"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 2,515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2011, 7:29 am
’” Ronald Dworkin has an article (subscription required) and two blog posts at the New York Review of Books. [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:03 am
In his Sidebar column for the New York Times, Adam Liptak highlights a cert. petition filed by a murder convict alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:02 am
The idiosyncracy is that New York hasn't adopted the federal test of Strickland v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 5:16 pm
A story by Adam Liptak in the New York Times raises the question of whether the backing out by King & Spalding from their representation of the House of Representatives in the defense of DOMA marks a turning point—"the moment at which opposition to same-sex marriage came to look like bigotry, similar to racial discrimination and the subordination of women. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 5:24 pm
in Virginia v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Each case involves the reweighing of risks and benefits in light of “new information” or a “new . . . safer design. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:11 am
” In the New York Times, Adam Liptak links the “somewhat esoteric” Sorrell case to Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:05 am
Adam Liptak of the New York Times notes that it “appears almost certain that all nine justices will hear cases challenging the law when they reach the court in ordinary course, probably in the term that starts in October”; on that note, Ilya Shapiro at Cato@Liberty observes that “there does not as yet seem to be a ‘smoking gun’” that would require Justice Kagan to recuse herself. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 8:51 am
In the matter of Paper v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:26 am
New York Times reporters Adam Liptak and Lisa Faye Petak have this story.Indiana Supreme Court Hears Argument on Convict Voting: Charles Wilson of the AP reports the Indiana Supreme Court heard argument today in a case challenging the scope of a state law stripping the voting rights of those in jail. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:25 am
Adam Liptak reports for the New York Times that “[n]o one questioned the basic premise of the suit — that greenhouse gas emissions contribute to global warming. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 5:31 am
http://tinyurl.com/3n5rvqv (Gabe Acevedo) Of ZIP Codes, Web Privacy & the Law - http://tinyurl.com/3qhbrs2 (Stephen Bennett) Risks and Rewards: The Wild West of Social Media v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:06 am
Nearly every major outlet – including the Associated Press, Washington Post, NPR, UPI, Bloomberg, CNN, BBC News, New York Times, and Courthouse News Service, among others — had coverage of one case in which the Court denied review yesterday: Kiyemba v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm
" Empire State Development President & CEO Kenneth Adams said, "This opportunity was the result of a strong working relationship between ESD and GM, as well as the company's faith in New York State and its workers here in Rochester. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:51 am
Dukes, The New York Times ran an interesting April 3, 2011 article by Adam Liptak entitled “When a Lawsuit Is Too Big. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:26 am
And yet there is also outrage at the idea that everyone, no matter how trivial their offense or utterly lacking in reason to suspect they possess a weapon, is subject to a terribly demeaning, intrusive search.At the New York Times, Adam Liptak wrote about the petition for cert, detailing some of the less than obvious arguments in favor of searching everyone, no matter what the reason for their custody (like violating a leash law or non-payment of child support). [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:36 am
And finally, Adam Liptak of the New York Times describes how “the justices of late have been jostling for judicial airtime in a sort of verbal roller derby. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:52 am
” In the New York Times, Adam Liptak asks whether “a class-action lawsuit [can] be too sprawling to deliver old-fashioned justice,” and discusses the state of class litigation with several professors. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:28 pm
Neoliberalism v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:27 am
New York, an exclusionary rule case that was argued last week. [read post]
