Search for: "Asbestos Litigation" Results 1901 - 1920 of 2,072
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Government is a party to the litigation; and (2) actions in which the rights involved are “integrally related to particular federal government action” or a federal regulatory scheme. 131 S.Ct. at 2611-13. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 10:00 pm
Easterbrook's analysis of applicability of stay on a DJ action of noninfringement brought by debtor. http://t.co/ENDpu0r D-IL wont w/draw ref. of fr. tsf action; Stern didn't strip BK Ct of auth. to hear claims & propose facts/law to D-CT. http://t.co/pFDS1XJ 7th: When LLC mgmt is vested in its members, the members are like a corp. directors & so are insiders per §101(31)(B). http://t.co/SvDFYRA B-TX: BakerBotts gets lodestar + 4% enhancement (not 20%… [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 2:28 pm by Chip Merlin
’ Neither Liberty Mutual nor Aftermath Services seem to be having any success so far in this litigation. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:06 am
They're sending patent litigators to court -- not to try a case, but as highly informed (and highly paid) observers. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:11 pm by Peter Breslauer
”  2014 WL 123099, at *2 (citing In re Ductile Iron Pipe Fittings (DIPF) Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Litig., 2013 WL 5503308, at *11-12 (D.N.J. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:54 am by Steven Jensen
  Over the years, I have worked on cases for people poisoned by a large variety of chemicals, including asbestos, radiation, lead, trichloroethylene, dioxins, beryllium, and benzene, to name a few. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Cape Intermediate Ltd v Dring (for and on behalf of Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK), heard 18-19 Feb 2019. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Cape Intermediate Ltd v Dring (for and on behalf of Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK), heard 18-19 Feb 2019. [read post]
In 2012, Madison County made up only 0.0008 percent of the nation’s population, but the jurisdiction handled 25 percent or more of the nation’s asbestos cases. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 5:36 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 265 (1964); In re Asbestos School Litigation, 46 F.3d 1284, 1294-96 (3d Cir. 1994). [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:55 am by Mike Aylward
Comment: Eljer had consequences well beyond its facts, particularly in the context of asbestos building claims. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 6:42 pm by Michael Stack
A structured settlement can avoid the uncertainty of litigation and end the on-going legal expense. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Cape Intermediate Ltd v Dring (for and on behalf of Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK), heard 18-19 Feb 2019. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:12 am by TARUNABH KHAITAN
In indirect discrimination litigation, given the aggregate nature of the claims, it is hard enough for information-poor claimants to establish causation. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:50 am by James Innocent
However, the Actos litigation has far more than a single plaintiff. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Cape Intermediate Ltd v Dring (for and on behalf of Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK), heard 18-19 Feb 2019. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:36 pm by admin
Questions for Consideration The remedy is very costly to the employer due to the length of time it took to litigate the case and get a decision. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 7:18 am by Andrea Patrick
  And they can expressly exclude some very expensive claims, such as those arising out of asbestos exposure, arising out of silica exposure and other claims like that. [read post]