Search for: "Banks v. State" Results 1901 - 1920 of 13,916
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm
Soemtimes I can figure things out on my own, even when they're not expressly stated. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Overton v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:38 am by Richard Montes
In a case having potentially enormous implications on foreclosure actions in New York State and throughout the country, the Second Department in Bank of New York v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Bank National Association, 479 F.3d 994, 1000 (9th Cir. 2007) and Guglielmino v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 9:13 am
Briggs repaid them the amounts stated in the discovery response. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:02 am by Bob Fraser
  The 2008 Superior Court of Quebec decision in Teitelbaum v. 9093-8119 Quebec Inc. and the 1980 Ontario Supreme Court decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:09 pm by Jon
    Be it therefore resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the State of Georgia, in General Assembly met, and acting for the people thereof, that the State of Georgia, in conformity with the fifth article of the federal constitution, hereby makes application to the Congress of the United States for the call of a Convention of the people to amend the constitution aforesaid in the particulars herein enumerated, and in such others as the… [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:17 pm by Peter Moulinos
Any questions regarding this action, or similar issues, can be directed to Peter Moulinos at peter@moulinos.com.A Supreme Court judge in Suffolk County has decided that Bank of America should be penalized for its abusive tactics against a homeowner whose property was in foreclosure by reducing in half the amount owed by the homeowner to Bank of America.Judge Arlen Spinner, who as previously issued harsh and newsworthy decisions against banks in foreclosure cases, ruled in… [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:35 pm
Bank of America - foreign judgments Dickinson v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:43 am
  Section 1819(b)(2) of FIRREA, for example, allows the FDIC  to remove to federal court a state court case involving a bank once the agency becomes the bank's receiver. [read post]