Search for: "California v. Texas"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 4,429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2021, 7:05 am
[The Supreme Court properly concludes that there is no standing to challenge a legal provision that has no effect. ] As expected, the Supreme Court rejected Texas' latest challenge to the Affordable Care Act in California v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
Brunswick Corporation (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Formation of company to prosecute false marking claims does not manipulate venue: Texas Data v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
., Broadcom v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 4:31 am
Plaintiffs pointed the trial court to 3 cases from California, Texas, and Oklahoma, over the past 30 years in which children had been injured while attempting to “ride” on an oil well pumping unit. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Frank v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:56 am
This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s argument in Allen v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:46 am
University of Texas at Austin, commentators continue to speculate about and debate the possible outcomes of these cases. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 9:23 am
In California v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
In Fisher v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:06 am
California, 538 U.S. 11 (2003) (upholding a sentence of twenty-five years to life under California’s three-strikes law for the theft of three golf clubs); Hutto v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 11:26 am
New enforcement data added to HHS' web site on HIPAA privacy compliance & enforcement - New Jersey attorney Helen Oscislawski of Fox Rothschild in the firm's HIPAA Health Law Blog Divorce and the housing market in New Hampshire - Manchester lawyer Kysa Crusco in her New Hampshire Family Law Blog Iowa enacts 43rd state breach notification law - Los Angeles attorney Tanya Forsheit of Proskauer Rose in the firm's Privacy Law Blog Writing the better contract from Anita… [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 11:31 am
Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:38 am
Some state courts, including California and Texas, have also adopted the apex deposition rule in the corporate context. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 10:25 am
(See Scheiding v Dinwiddie Constr. [read post]
Guest Post: In Rush to Invalidate Patents at Pleadings Stage, Are Courts Coloring Outside the Lines?
1 Jul 2015, 3:30 pm
These Federal Circuit cases teach that it is acceptable to consider matters outside of the complaint, as confirmed by Affinity Labs of Texas v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 9:42 am
See Arguellas-Olivares v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Harris, University of California, Davis, School of Law Stephen Lee, University of California, Irvine School of Law Guadalupe T. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:32 pm
In University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:38 am
S. 377, 385–386 (1992); Texas v. [read post]
