Search for: "DUKE v. STATE"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 2,007
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2021, 8:49 am
United States, 95 Chi. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 3:02 pm
“Bush v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:57 pm
(The case is Territory v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 6:04 am
“Bush v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Click Here Beef slaughterhouse in Wash. state to pay $750,000. [read post]
The Slovak Constitutional Court on Risk Profiling and Automated Decision-Making by the Tax Authority
17 Dec 2021, 11:46 am
In their recent opinion on the Big Brother Watch and Others v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 7:47 am
Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court has developed this concept further since Youngstown; the most frequently cited case is Dames & Moore v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:28 am
Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011). [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
John Reed Stark Most readers are undoubtedly familiar with the concept of “insider trading” – that is, the purchase or sale by company insiders of their personal holdings in company shares based on material non-public information. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
The scales have swung back and forwards starting with the laissez faire approach of the House of Lords in the famous Duke of Westminster case in which it was said that it was open to a taxpayer to arrange his affairs in whatever way he chose in order to minimise the tax payable. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
In American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:41 am
Smith In the six years since the landmark Kelo v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:06 pm
., Amber Taylor responds to her heckler by explaining how he also could get into Harvard.David Lat at Above the Law reports on the case of Steinbuch v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:03 pm
The pending Dukes v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
Below, I elaborate first on how transaction costs doom the aims of age-verification and verifiable parental-consent laws, and then consider the state of First Amendment precedent for anonymous speech as it relates to age-verification laws. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 3:48 pm
As the courtroom saga unfolds, M&A players and practitioners should keep a watchful eye – not since In re IBP Inc. v. [read post]
Guest Post: Checking the “Staats” – in Broadening Reissue Practice, We Are Stuck in the “Doll”-drums
6 Mar 2012, 11:28 pm
, 2011 Duke L. [read post]
