Search for: "Doe 103"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 3,234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2012, 4:02 am
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103 (1), 121-34 PMID: 22468947 Image No related posts. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Fire Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 12:57 pm
In the AmeriCounsel scheme, which dates back to 2000, the Nassau County Bar concluded that: "[S[ince AmeriCounsel does not charge attorneys any fee and since AmeriCounsel does not "recommend" or "promote" the use of any particular lawyer's services, it does not fall within the purview of DR 2-103(B) or (D). [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:13 am
., 103 U.S.P.Q.2d 1753 (Fed. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 2:59 am
He told the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP) Monday that the 27 member EU countries he represents have some significant issues with FSMA.So what does all this mean? [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:23 pm
The effects of res judicata are specified in art. 103 of the CDC, the systematic secundum eventus litis. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:12 am
"Applicant pointed out that the USPTO does not provide a design code for the question mark for purposes of searching the USPTO database, arguing that the PTO thus "does not believe that the question mark is a significant feature of the mark, and that it is not necessary to include the question mark in a search for the mark. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 11:24 am
I was advised that Tennessee does collect DNA samples at the time of arrest in some cases. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:35 am
., 103 USPQ2d 1672 (Fed. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:17 am
The application of the exemption does not depend on the applicant or their address' ( at [50]). [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:58 am
The application of the exemption does not depend on the applicant or their address' ( at [50]). [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:32 am
[6] Congress can also provide some finality on the issue of whether patentable subject matter is a separate requirement from 102, 103 and 112. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:10 am
Simpson, 103 Cal.Rptr.2d 492 (2001) And I sighed. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:04 am
It does seem that the mere descriptiveness claim has some merit. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 8:03 am
§§ 102 and 103 grounds, but only prior art consisting of patents or printed publications can be used. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:08 pm
While it is arguable that “promotional activities” form part of a “distribution,” given separate reference to both in the Instrument, it can only be assumed that the debt issuer exemption does not extend to an issuer carrying out promotional activities where a private placement is not effected. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:08 pm
While it is arguable that “promotional activities” form part of a “distribution,” given separate reference to both in the Instrument, it can only be assumed that the debt issuer exemption does not extend to an issuer carrying out promotional activities where a private placement is not effected. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:24 am
The sound power level of a typical modern utility scale wind turbine is on the order of 103 dB(A), but can be somewhat higher or lower depending on the details of the design and the rated power of the turbine. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 4:40 am
State, 993 S.W.2d 103 (1999), where our Court of Appeals said arrestees still retain some level of privacy interest in personal effects or belongings taken from them after arrest. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:54 pm
The court explained that in contrast to Section 101, which sets forth the type of subject matter that is patent-eligible, Sections 102 (novelty) and 103 (obviousness) broadly ensure that the public remains free to use that which is known, and obvious variants thereof. [read post]
