Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 9,566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2024, 8:23 am
When exactly does use of computer tools for document drafting rise to the level of 1.56(b) materiality? [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 1:08 pm
Nov. 1, 2012). [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:39 am
I had just a few thoughts to add.1. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 11:08 am
Id. at *1-3. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 8:44 pm
And if it does, what it is “allure”? [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 3:58 am
The full PRC AI plan is set out in 35 pages of dense, jargon heavy, Chinese bureaucratic prose. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 3:43 am
If the Senate does pass a bill, it likely will be sent to the House for swift passage by the House without amendments, eliminating the need for a Senate-House conference. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 7:36 pm
§ 257(c)(1). [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm
A lot of people have written in to ask, "How big a tax increase is this, and how does it compare to the expiration of the Bush tax cuts for high income earners? [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:40 pm
Correlation does not prove causation, but it's damned strong evidence of it. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:10 pm
” Id., ¶ 35. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:16 pm
NO. 112-98, pt. 1 (2011). [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 1:51 pm
[Montana State just beat Division I-AA 8th-ranked Furman 31-13 in the playoffs and will play Nr. 1 ranked Appalachian State on Dec. 2. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
But what is the practice by livestock producers and what does the consumer not know about the recent changes? [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:10 pm
All claim 6 does is add a “generating said supplied file” limitation to claim 1’s deciding step. [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:02 am
In the rare situation where it clear that the application does not name the correct inventorship and the applicant has not filed a request to correct inventorship under 37 CFR 1.48, Office personnel should reject the claims under 35 U.S.C. 101 and 35 U.S.C. 115. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 2:21 pm
Strangely, however, s. 51(1) does not seem to prohibit contracting work to unlicensed persons. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 5:18 am
If their taxable estate does not consume the entire $5 million exemption, the unused portion can be passed on to their surviving spouse. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 1:08 pm
Additional Points 1. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 1:17 pm
The Senate Committee on Aboriginal Peoples has become a safe haven for quite sensible studies of successive Governments’ failures to fulfill their s.35 (1) obligations. [read post]
