Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 1,996
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
: (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), Does Petra Moser show patents encourage successful innovation? [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Douglas, No. 06-0581 Conviction for killing a person in connection with an attempt to steal money from ATM machines is affirmed over defendant's claims that: 1) being charged with an offense punishable by death entitled him to representation by two attorneys, and the district court erred in dismissing one of his two appointed attorneys after the government stated that it would not seek death penalty; 2) the government engaged in impermissible discrimination… [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
, 20-21 May: US ACI ‘In-house counsel forum on pharmaceutical antitrust’ – Maryland: (Orange Book Blog), 26-27 May : EU Workshop for mediators in IP disputes – Geneva: (IPR-Helpdesk), 27 May: Oliver Rivers to give short talk on ‘spurious precision’ – London: (IP finance), 28 May / 11June: US PLI ‘Advanced patent licensing 2008: What you need to know before licensing your patent’ – New… [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:28 am
(See United States Trust Co. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Moore, No. 06-1082 In a case raising the issue of whether a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment by making an arrest based on probable cause but prohibited by state law, the Supreme Court rules that warrantless arrests for crimes committed in the presence of an arresting officer are reasonable under the Constitution, and that while states are free to regulate such arrests however they desire, state restrictions do not alter the Fourth… [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
This trend is not going to reverse or decelerate. 20 years ago the percentage of lawyers working at NLJ 250 firms who were in overseas offices was just a few percent. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
– ownership of IP: (Dilanchian), Consultant or contractor IP: (Dilanchian), IP and general business law issues: Website terms of use reduce risk: (Dilanchian), Plant breeder’s rights actions in the Federal Court will now be regarded as IP cases for the purpose of docket allocation: (IPwar’s), Ajinomoto v NutraSweet – inventive step and costs: (IPRoo), Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft 2020 submission: (LawFont.com) … [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Hendry, No. 06-5118 Sentence calculation for entering the United States after having been lawfully deported following a conviction of an aggravated felony is affirmed over claims that: 1) the existence of "fast-track-programs" in some districts but not others not only created unwarranted disparities but also violated the parsimony provision of 18 U.S.C. section 3553(a); and 2) the sentencing court placed too much weight on the Guidelines, to the exclusion of… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Jeross, No. 06-2257, 06-2502 Defendants' sentences for their roles in a Detroit-based conspiracy to possess and distribute at least 100,000 Ecstacy pills are affirmed over their claims that the district court: 1) used an incorrect version of the Guidelines; 2) improperly extrapolated the total weight of the Ecstacy pills from the actual weight of a smaller number of pills actually recovered; 3) denied them the opportunity to personally address the court at their resentencing hearings;… [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 12:06 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 5:59 am
Reg. 46,716-843 (Aug. 21, 2007)(to be codified at 37 C.F.R. pt. 1)(the "Final Rules") under his decision in Tafas v. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 3:07 pm
Does 1-16 and Arista v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Branker, No. 07-6 Dismissal of a petition for writ of habeas corpus in a death penalty case is affirmed over claims that: 1) the absence of newly available evidence from a key witness undermined the jury's capital sentence and entitled petitioner to a new sentencing proceeding; 2) his attorneys' motion to sever constituted ineffective assistance of counsel; 3) his attorneys' approach to mitigation during penalty phase of trial also constituted ineffective… [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Google fails to obtain pan-EU trade mark protection for ‘Gmail’ due to confusingly similar German trade mark: (Class 46), (Ars Technica),UK High Court overturns UKIPO decision to refuse computer program patent application in Symbian’s Patent Application, UKIPO announces it will appeal (equivalent patent granted by EPO):… [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
For instance, there is no provision like Article 1, Section 8, clause 8 of the United States Constitution in any of the treaties establishing the TEU that protects intellectual property rights like the United States does.[39] While the ultimate goal is to harmonize all Member States in their approach to intellectual property rights, such a goal has not yet been entirely attained. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:16 pm
Nelson v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:55 am
Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, the United States Supreme Court??? [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:24 am
A short list follows.1. [read post]
