Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 3,413
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2014, 7:14 pm
How on earth does that case not get charged? [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:14 am
Specifically, the district court found that relief under the Rule was unavailable to a party that stipulates to the dismissal of a lawsuit under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) because such a dismissal does not constitute a “judgment, order, or proceeding” under Rule 60(b). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:51 am
According to a summary of the results, the theory was only tested on 54 people. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 5:53 pm
Consumers also can contact Kraft Foods Consumer Relations at 1-800-310-3704 between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
1. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
1. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:32 am
1 [Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes] § 1921(a). [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:52 am
If the answer to question one (1) above is in the affirmative, does the trial court retain the discretion to grant or deny authorization for public expenditure for any such expert witness [or investigator] fee[s] based upon the trial court's threshold determination [that such services are reasonably necessary to formulate and present a defense]? [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:51 am
See the first comment appended to this 2007 post (Christine Hurt, Bluebook Pet Peeves, THE CONGLOMERATE (March 13, 2007), http://www.theconglomerate.org/2007/03/bluebook_pet_pe.html#c63110048): 1. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:30 am
On the anniversary of that first leak, here are 65 things we know about NSA spying that we did not know a year ago: 1. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:30 am
§§411.20-54, support the notion of “future medicals. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:30 am
§§411.20-54, support the notion of “future medicals. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:44 pm
The Rutherfords’ claim was article 14 disability discrimination by way of Art 1 Prot 1 rights. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:31 pm
Therefore, we will enter a new ground of rejection of claims 1-50, 53, and 54 as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:01 am
It does not, however, apply to trusts established by will. [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:45 am
The ECJ seems broadly to have agreed, again emphasising the purpose of the DPD and the need to protect privacy (paras 53-54). [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:15 pm
On May 1, 2014, FTC Chief Administrative Law Judge D. [read post]
2 May 2014, 11:57 am
How does it compare to previous years? [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:35 am
The Indian SC is an explicitly political institution which does not pretend to be otherwise. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:33 pm
See N.J.S.A. 54:4-1. [read post]
