Search for: "Does 1-96"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 2,170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
The proposals of the Heidelberg Report 1. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
By itself, the Executive Summary’s pagination runs from 1 to 22. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:11 pm
Liquidation of SPIA payment rights does not involve Court approval. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 11:13 am
Among the issues that the agencies have requested comments: 1. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:22 am
Examples include: (1) The $13 fee for machine-readable BCCs for certain Mexican citizen minors, Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1999, Public Law 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681-50, Div. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:02 pm
The implicit disclosure means no more than the clear and unambiguous consequence of what is explicitly mentioned (see T 823/96). [3.2] It is matter of fact that the application as filed does not explicitly disclose the step of making an array of spatially segregated organometallic metal ligand compounds (step (a) of the method of claim 1). [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 7:25 am
129/96 Inter-Environnement Wallonie [1997] ECR I? [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 3:03 pm
[…] Claim 1 filed with the reply does not differ from claim 1 of the application as filed in such a way that the reasons for the raised objection under A 83 would substantially change. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 3:01 pm
There was one single A 96(2) notification. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:51 am
Prescription drugs are invaluable tools in the practice of medicine, used to treat numerous illnesses and diseases. [read post]
ANN ALTHOUSE WILL BE LIVEBLOGGING the State Of The Union. And Jason Pye emails that the folks at Un…
27 Jan 2010, 5:55 pm
What does that mean? [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 22, 2010 Doe-2 v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 22, 2010 Doe-2 v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:04 pm
This does not mean, however, that the filing of a divisional application could be regarded as a response to the said communication within the meaning of A 96(2). [2.3] A divisional application is legally and administratively separate and independent from the grant proceedings concerning the parent application (see G 1/05 [3.1 and 8.1]; T 441/92 [4.1]). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
To gain the protection of the Defence, the defendant must establish two elements: (1) that the publication is on a matter of public interest; and (2) that the publication was responsible, in that the defendant was diligent in trying to verify the allegation. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
To gain the protection of the Defence, the defendant must establish two elements: (1) that the publication is on a matter of public interest; and (2) that the publication was responsible, in that the defendant was diligent in trying to verify the allegation. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 6:57 pm
Free File Fillable Forms does not support state forms or state electronic filing. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:02 pm
The present appeal was filed after the Examining Division (ED) had rejected a further extension of the time limit for filing observations pursuant to A 96(2) EPC 1973. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 7:16 am
Generally 29 CFR 2510.3-1 provides that the definition of "employee welfare benefit plans" in Section 3(1) of ERISA does not include arrangements that pay an employee's normal compensation, out of the employer's general assets, on account of periods of time during which the employee is physically or mentally unable to perform his or her duties, or is otherwise absent for medical reasons. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
(Myrick dep., pp. 33, 54, 70, 77, 94, 95-96, 99, 130-32, 166, 175, 227, 250). [read post]
