Search for: "EMPLOYERS DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY" Results 1901 - 1920 of 3,665
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 4:36 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
It eliminates the direct, vertical link requirement between company and worker, effectively extending immunity to every construction site employer. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
This may include accountants, trustees in bankruptcy, banks, insurance companies, or sureties. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:01 am by Anna Gamvros and Ruby Kwok (HK)
Insurance Agent Case An insurance agent, knowing that an insurance company had suspended services provided to an individual, sent a letter to the individual that promoted the services of another insurance company. [read post]
17 May 2016, 7:33 am by Marty Lederman
Many employers with church plans will conclude that their religious obligations are not violated if and when the TPAs provide payments voluntarily, outside the auspices of the church plan, as long as the employers themselves are not required to participate in any way. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:33 pm by Erin Morrow Hawley
After oral argument, the Court requested additional briefing from the parties as to “whether contraceptive coverage could be provided to petitioners’ employees, through petitioners’ insurance companies, without any such notice from petitioners. [read post]
14 May 2016, 7:46 pm by Thomas Atkinson
 In some cases injured workers like you are being directed to doctors that have secret relationships with the insurance company and aren't really looking out for you. [read post]
10 May 2016, 4:30 am by David DePaolo
I know I'm going to get flamed for this blog post, but I have always committed to telling the story the way I see it.I have taken on insurance companies and their executives, doctors and other medical vendors, attorneys and the legal profession.Politicians of course haven't escaped my vitriol, and employers also haven't escaped criticism.The only workers' compensation population that hasn't been met with cynicism has been injured… [read post]
8 May 2016, 9:01 pm
Current Status: 4/28/2015 - House Ways and Means, (Second Hearing) ORC Sections: 5705.19 HB95 DENTAL INSURERS-NO FEE SCHEDULE (DEVITIS A) To prohibit a health insurer from establishing a fee schedule for dental providers for services that are not covered by any contract or participating provider agreement between the health insurer and the dental provider. [read post]
8 May 2016, 9:56 am by Nassiri Law
The EEOC asserted this was in direct violation of the Age Discrimination Act in Employment (ADEA). [read post]
Therefore, you may not set an additional probation period for this employee when he or she becomes your direct hire. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:50 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  For that reason, as a result of the DoJ’s new directive companies’ D&O insurance protection could become more important than ever. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
It’s either going to be an employee-directed state, an employer-directed state, or often times a blend of those two. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:07 am by David DePaolo
The injury occurred on the employer's parking lot where all employees parked under the direction of Quality, and Shaw fell only 10-12 feet from the exit door.The court noted that, according to Shaw's testimony at trial, his knee had popped before his right foot made contact with the parking lot surface and he collapsed. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 1:20 pm by Felicia S. O'Connor
To determine the appropriate classification, employers may need to use a different test under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the state’s specific wage and hour laws, and the state agency’s rules governing whether a worker is eligible for unemployment insurance benefits or if they are covered under the employer’s workers’ compensation policy. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 10:07 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  For this reason, most Covered Entities and their business associates will want to consider arranging for this review and analysis to be conducted within the scope of attorney-client privilege by or under the direction of qualified legal counsel with HI [read post]