Search for: "Fells v. State"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 7,326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2012, 4:27 am
In the case of Lawrence v Texas, the U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 11:34 am
In Mooney v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 11:34 am
In Mooney v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:19 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 2:58 pm
"Jack Fell In the Box: In Jack in the Box Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:57 am
In this post, David McKie, Partner, and Dany Bitar, Associate in the litigation team at CMS, preview the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Argentum Exploration Ltd (Respondent) v Republic of South Africa (Appellant). [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 2:41 am
They were acquitted at trial because their actions fell within the “lawful authority or excuse” defence contained in that section. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 4:14 pm
Henri v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:21 am
State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 5:12 am
Yesterday, in Fulgenzi v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
In Meadows v Khan and Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton, the Supreme Court set out a six-part test for determining a damages claim for the tort of negligence. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:13 pm
A recent New York Appellate Division, First Department case—Marte v Tishman Constr. [read post]
24 May 2017, 5:36 am
The Court of Appeals disagrees, killing off the habeas petition.The case is Waiters v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:59 am
However, the subpoena sought information about all Hosts that offered accommodations in New York from 2010 to the present, making no effort to exclude those users who plainly fell outside the laws at issue. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:28 am
The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania recently dealt with an extraterritorial jurisdiction case in the matter of Greenawalt v. [read post]
New Article: “It’s Not You, It’s Your Caseload”: Using Cronic to Solve Indigent Defense Underfunding
28 Sep 2018, 7:17 am
This Note argues that courts should utilize the procedural ineffectiveness presumption that the Supreme Court made available in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Comment The majority’s assessment of proportionality focused on whether the PSNI’s policy fell within the state’s margin of appreciation, rather looking at whether less restrictive measures should have been adopted [20], and there was no close analysis of whether the measure was rationally connected to the legislative objective. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 7:31 am
Although the Plaintiff admittedly could not state how long the water was located on the lobby floor, she did offer evidence of the official weather reports confirming that snow and freezing rain fell over the 24 hours leading up to the event. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:06 am
In the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 4:30 am
The Court recently held oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
