Search for: "German v. German"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 5,198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2011, 5:49 am
The point has been made in both English and German courts that public announcements by the impugned party in its own words carry less weight than judicial ones (Jameel (Mohammed) v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2007] 1 AC 359 at 376). [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:18 pm
Richard Weizel of Reuters reports that last August, in the case of Santiago v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:41 pm
A relatively recent case from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR--photo at right) Kononov v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
MEREDITH CORPORATION v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 1:16 pm
" In the case of State of New Jersey v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 4:51 am
Rochin-German, 2007 U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2006, 1:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 11:51 am
I, too, have faced shitstorms because of pro-copyright positions I took in connection with Oracle v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:18 am
On TOP of this is a discount for the larger promoters of 14.5% and then an additional 20% discount or rebate available to members of the German concert promoters association BDV (Bundesverband der Veranstaltungswirtschaftand) one other trade body. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 2:10 am
Since both Normans and Goths were Germanic peoples, the Franks might well have referred the Normans as "Visigoths" with the expression bigot. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 7:36 am
.' In the final decades of the Hapsburg empire, one nationality after another turned its back on the empire, including, finally, the Austro-Germans, who adopted a national, indeed völkisch, identification as Germans. [read post]
29 May 2018, 7:21 am
Vicks – When Vicks was introduced in Germany, somebody forgot that the German pronunciation of “v” is “f” which made their “Vicks” brand name sound like slang for sexual intercourse (the name in German speaking countries is now Wick which translates correctly). [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 1:11 am
The annex includes a reprint of “Arbitration v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 9:58 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
.*** Translation of the German original ***[2] The compounds claimed in claims 4 and 5 are not defined by reproducible physical or chemical parameters – such as for example their chemical structure – but by the process for their preparation.[2.1] According to the case law of the Boards of appeal (see T 150/82 [10]), such a definition is admissible only if the compounds themselves fulfil the requirements for patentability and there is no other reproducible parameter available in… [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
See Coflexip v Stolt, here]. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
529/07 Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH, also known as the "Easter bunnies' case", which was a reference for a preliminary ruling from Austria on the question of how to establish bad faith in trade mark invalidity proceedings. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 3:46 pm
The demonstrators had to stay behind barriers in Városmajor park during the event. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 5:53 am
The case is Louichi Taniguchi v. [read post]
