Search for: "German v. State" Results 1901 - 1920 of 3,142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2010, 8:52 am by Lyle Denniston
In October 2007, the Supreme Court denied review of the first challenge to “rendition,” filed by Khaled El-Masri, a German citizen who was abducted and sent to Afghanistan, where he complained he was subjected to torture by American agents (El-Masri v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:56 pm
(IP tango)   Netherlands BREIN wants Dutch ISP to block The Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak)   New Zealand Kiwi 3 strikes anti-piracy bill receives unanimous support (TorrentFreak)   Poland Infringement of personal rights and company name in domain name – all in one case (Class 46)   Sweden Hollywood: It’s time for court to impose Pirate Bay fines (TorrentFreak) Why a calendar company wants to take over The Pirate Bay (Ars Technica) Movie studios threaten strike on Pirate… [read post]
22 May 2017, 12:26 am by Supreme People's Court Monitor
Some examples in recent months include:  excerpts from Supreme Court decision Padilla v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:57 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
These cases demonstrate clearly the change of position as compared with Allianz v West Tankers and Turner v Grovit, respectively. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The Federal Court had occasion to consider this question in Molo Design Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 6:19 am by Paolo Busco
This position echoes the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) stance in Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights (Costa Rica v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 11:16 pm by Florian Mueller
But in case he hasn't noticed, the Netherlands is not the 51st state of the United States but a member state of the European Union.In the EU, however,the standard is different. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:03 am
The three that were particularly considered concerned:Corkscrews - El Hogar Perfecto V OHIM (T-337/12);Umbrellas - Senz Technologies BV v OHIM, (T-22/13 and T-23/13); andBiscuits - Biscuits Poult SA v OHIM (T-494/12).We were reminded that the only relevant sense to design law is sight. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 12:15 pm
  ["A recent case worth noting is University of Southern California v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:16 pm
Union of India  (Spicy IP)   Indonesia Indonesian government criticised for preferring ‘open source’ software (IP Whiteboard)   Netherlands Dutch Court to differ from German Orange Book decision: Micro Fusion 2004-1 LLP v Revenue & Customs Commissioners (ipeg) Relationship between patents and standards – the Dutch case Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. [read post]