Search for: "HARRIS v. STATE" Results 1901 - 1920 of 5,229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm by Record on Appeal
Harris – a case involving the reliability of testing protocols related to drug sniffing dogs (is more than a “certification” statement required);  Chaidez v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
  The new scheme was criticised in a post on Inforrm by Evan Harris and by Brian Cathcart on Byline. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm by John Elwood
Harris, 12-885, a state-on-top habeas case from the Seventh Circuit, and Sims v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Likewise, the allegations of defamation failed to state a cause of action. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
More specifically, those taking this positon cite Richard Nixon, not Harry Blackmun in writing Roe, as the villain. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Quinn amicus] “Alcoholism and the ADA: Not as clear-cut as you think” [Dan Wisniewski, HR Morning, on Crosby v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
Thomas, United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:55 am by Chris Seaton
Now an algorithm had the discretion thanks to a state mandate, and that algorithm assigned Judge Waters the case of Bishop v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
Harris County Assistant District Attorney Roe Wilson said the next step must wait until the justices resolve another case regarding the legality of lethal injections. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:16 am by SHG
At The Watch, Radley Balko dissects the Seventh Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:18 pm by Dan
The story concludes with the key point, that Chinese companies listing or doing business in the United States had better start getting used to being sued in the United States According to Harris, that VisionChina, a Chinese company doing business exclusively in China, chose to sue in New York is a testament in itself to the new calculation for US-listed companies. [read post]