Search for: "House v. State"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 25,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2019, 2:16 am
The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal insofar as interpreting the relevant legal provisions differently from the Inner House. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 8:03 am
Mozes v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
United States (Arizona's likely appeal to the Supreme Court of United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 10:03 am
Velozny v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 12:55 pm
He argues that the consecutive sentences: violate his rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments as explained in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
In HIRA Educational Services North America v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 9:24 am
State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 9:22 am
See Entwistle v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:25 pm
Samsung and FTC v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Isenberg v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 5:50 am
Apparently referring to the Supreme Court’s holding in INS v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:57 am
Also because of the combination, FOSTA enabled a Section 230 exclusion for civil claims for state commercial sex promotions but not for state sex trafficking claims. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:30 am
It’s been 64 years this week since Brown v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
On April 22, 2024, the Tennessee Governor signed into law House Bill 2100 (“TN HB 2100”), a fair access law that will, effective July 1, 2024, apply to, among others, national banks and state banks with more than $100 billion in assets, as well as insurers. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:50 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) O’Connell v Viridian Housing [2012] EWHC 1389 (QB) (25 May 2012) Lewis v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Ors [2012] EWHC 1391 (QB) (25 May 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) HM Revenue and Customs v The Football League Ltd & Anor [2012] EWHC 1372 (Ch) (25 May 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Shanmuganathan, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:52 am
The Washington Independent recounts Wednesday's House Judiciary Committee hearing on the effects of Ashcroft v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 12:05 pm
On April 18, 2017, the state of Washington passed House Bill 1493 (“HB 1493”), which sets forth requirements for businesses who collect and use biometric identifiers for commercial purposes. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:37 am
Ross Decisions in Buchek v. [read post]