Search for: "House v. State" Results 1901 - 1920 of 25,342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2019, 2:16 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal insofar as interpreting the relevant legal provisions differently from the Inner House. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
United States (Arizona's likely appeal to the Supreme Court of United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 12:55 pm
He argues that the consecutive sentences: violate his rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments as explained in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:57 am by Eric Goldman
Also because of the combination, FOSTA enabled a Section 230 exclusion for civil claims for state commercial sex promotions but not for state sex trafficking claims. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On April 22, 2024, the Tennessee Governor signed into law House Bill 2100 (“TN HB 2100”), a fair access law that will, effective July 1, 2024, apply to, among others, national banks and state banks with more than $100 billion in assets, as well as insurers. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:50 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) O’Connell v Viridian Housing [2012] EWHC 1389 (QB) (25 May 2012) Lewis v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Ors [2012] EWHC 1391 (QB) (25 May 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) HM Revenue and Customs v The Football League Ltd & Anor [2012] EWHC 1372 (Ch) (25 May 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Shanmuganathan, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:52 am by Erin Miller
The Washington Independent recounts Wednesday's House Judiciary Committee hearing on the effects of Ashcroft v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 12:05 pm by Torsten M. Kracht and Rachel E. Mossman
On April 18, 2017, the state of Washington passed House Bill 1493 (“HB 1493”), which sets forth requirements for businesses who collect and use biometric identifiers for commercial purposes. [read post]