Search for: "Hughes v. Hughes"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 2,709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
PatentsGuestKat Rose Hughes reports on a recent English High Court case (Emson v Hozelock), in which Mr Justice Nugee, in a follow-up to the classic UK case Windsurfing, considered the issue of when a disclosure may be considered public. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
Inst. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm
Azar v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
This is a live blog of the third day of the hearing of the “Brexit” appeal. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
The seven claimants bringing proceedings are: Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon OBE; Elizabeth Hurley; Sir Elton John CH CBE; David Furnish; Sir Simon Hughes; Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex; and Sadie Frost Law. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am
Meanwhile, if you are still craving some celebrity evidence, you can watch Steve Coogan, Max Mosley, Zac Goldsmith MP and Hugh Grant give evidence to the Parliamentary Privacy and Injunctions Committee (remember them?) [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
Jan Hughes can proceed with her claim that Boston Scientific Corp. failed to properly warn her about the Hydro ThermAblator's burn risks, the 5th U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Speed v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm
Hughes v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm
” However, those problems, and the (at times) tortuous nature of Lord Neuberger’s reasoning in addressing them, were highlighted by the dissenting judges (Lords Wilson and Hughes), who took the view that the interpretation placed upon section 53 by the majority was too strained to be viable. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 11:18 am
Although the parties’ choice of law agreement generally governs which law is applied, in Hughes Electronics Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:02 am
This is the first judicial takings case for the Court, though former Justice Potter Stewart referred to the concept in his concurrence in Hughes v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 2:40 pm
Washington, a dispute between states over Washington’s denial of access to its ports to ship coal from Montana and Wyoming overseas; Hughes v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 11:35 am
The Decision in E.H. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm
On 5 August 2014, judgment was handed down in Hong Kong in the case of Yeung v Google ([2014] HKCFI 1404). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:43 am
Emma QC has been involved in some of the IPKat's favourite legal disputes, including Interflora v Marks & Spencer, Matratzen Concord v Hukla and one case which, in this Kat's opinion, should never have been allowed to go to court, Reed v Reed. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 2:05 am
Mallory v. [read post]
