Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 19,142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2024, 9:29 am
The case M.A. and Others v France was ruled unanimously. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
” This was the case in Doyle v Zochem, in which the Court of Appeal for Ontario awarded $60,000 to a former employee for moral damages, in addition to wrongful dismissal damages, human rights damages, and legal costs. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 7:30 am
Short pieces:Anti-Immigrant Rhetoric and Detaining the "Other" (Völkerrechtsblog, Feb. 2025) [text]High Court ruling reinforces prolonged and indefinite detention practices, violating Australia’s international obligations (Amnesty International, April 2025) [text]"How Guantánamo Bay Figures in the Trump Immigration Crackdown," New York Times, 4 April 2025 [text]- See also related Yahoo article on costs.Immigration detention practices and policies in… [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 9:02 am
This is what the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) had been asked to consider in Safarov v Azerbaijan (Application no. 885/12). [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
In March 2005 a State requested that the appellant’s name be added to the Consolidated List. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
In a case where human rights are adversely affected by an executive decision, the court must form its own view on proportionality: see [67]. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 2:16 pm
In Richardson v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 7:54 am
Citing Forrest v Jewish Guild for the Blind, 3 NY3d 295, the Appellate Division held that Supreme Court properly dismissed Plaintiff's age discrimination claim brought pursuant to the New York State Human Rights Law [Executive Law §296] because Plaintiff "failed to allege an adverse employment action. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 7:54 am
Citing Forrest v Jewish Guild for the Blind, 3 NY3d 295, the Appellate Division held that Supreme Court properly dismissed Plaintiff's age discrimination claim brought pursuant to the New York State Human Rights Law [Executive Law §296] because Plaintiff "failed to allege an adverse employment action. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 1:03 pm
” United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:41 am
The 2004 decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers ([2004] 2 AC 457) was a significant case regarding privacy, and for human rights law and tort law more generally. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
AGS CJ Corporation (Tribal Gaming; Tribal Lease Agreements) United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:01 pm
In Gasayev v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 11:17 am
Reno established a minimum standard of quality of life for undocumented immigrant children detained in the United States and recognized the Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law as the only nongovernmental organization authorized to certify that detention centers housing any undocumented minor met the agreed minimum standards and also established the prompt release of the minors and that they could be delivered to relatives residing in the United States as soon as… [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:44 pm
On May 16, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Zubik v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:32 am
Case overview In Nafeesa Syeed v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 7:17 pm
According to a report on CNN, the case will center on whether foreign victims of torture and other crimes against humanity can sue corporations and others in federal courts of the United States. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:07 pm
"Mother continued to deny she had a substance abuse problem stating she 'only uses meth to do yard work.'"Oh. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:30 am
Courtney Cahill Dissenting in the 1972 decision Stanley v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:15 pm
First, the majority held that the “undue burden” standard announced in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
