Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S."
Results 1901 - 1920
of 182,354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 of the granted patent read: A method for determining T-cell epitopes within a protein comprising the steps of: (a) obtaining from a single human blood sample a solution of dendritic cells and a solution of naïve CD4+ and/or CD8+ T-cells; (b) promoting differentiation in said solution of dendritic cells; (c) combining said solution of differentiated dendritic cells and said naïve CD4+ and/or CD8+ T-cells with a peptide of interest; (d) measuring… [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:05 pm
" t-shirt) [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
Furthermore, the auxiliary request was only filed with the letter of 15 December 2008 as a reaction to the Board’s communication of 4 June 2008 and the Opponent’s statement of 02 December 2008. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:09 am
I know there's a free trial period, but I just don't want to fuss with it. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 8:43 am
Miasia T. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:51 am
Here’s what you should know about the form 1098, Mortgage Interest Statement: A form 1098, Mortgage Interest Statement, is used to report mortgage interest, including points, of $600 or more paid to a lender for a mortgage. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO’s) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:57 am
The findings The Judge Dismissed the public interest defence advanced under s.4 Defamation Act 2013 for both the original and continuing online publication of the articles. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:51 am
Interesting article in today’s New York Times, What They Don’t Teach Law Students: Lawyering, describing what’s wrong with law school methodology and how law students graduate lacking the ability to do even basic legal practice. [read post]
20 May 2009, 10:55 am
There's no reason law firms couldn't implement the same strategy (for firms interested in learning how, see the end of this post for links to our podcast and landing page brochures). [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:03 am
The military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (”DADT”) policy on homosexual service members is put through the wringer in Witt v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 8:42 am
Since the Fifth Circuit didn’t bother, perhaps the justices will ask the university how it defines a “critical mass” of underrepresented minorities, how admissions officers know when it has been attained, and precisely how it furthers the school’s educational interests. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:32 pm
This isn't descriptive, it's pejorative, and we don't need an informatics team to tell us such things are bad.But the report definitely merits a read and is both interesting and ultimately reassuring that the underlying issues are being looked at broadly and with balance, not forgetting history or current stories either. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 5:00 am
Ben-Gurion, Begin and Rabin didn't decide to live modest lives and dispense with luxury: they were just not interested in luxuries, money or the easy life.No question but what he is onto something here, but it is hardly limited to Israel. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:57 am
Yes, it’s a bit a web, but aren’t all conflicts of interest? [read post]
DOES WISCONSIN’S JUDGE SUMI have a conflict of interest? “Her son is a political operative who also…
22 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
DOES WISCONSIN’S JUDGE SUMI have a conflict of interest? [read post]
21 May 2021, 8:40 am
Not only are wolf-livestock conflicts extremely rare, but the science has demonstrated that randomly killing wolves won’t prevent such conflicts—in fact, it can have the opposite effect. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 10:48 am
Shagang is in talks on its own, and isn’t aware of interests from other Chinese companies, Shagang Vice President Shen Wenming told Bloomberg. [...] [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 7:33 am
As a result, I couldn't live-blog Jeff Jarvis's interesting talk from earlier this morning. [read post]
13 May 2021, 10:13 am
Partnering with the ACLU and numerous other public interest advocates, businesses and educators, EFF has filed an amicus brief urging the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold a district court’s decision not to block enforcement of SB 822, a law that ensures that that all Californians have fair access to all internet content and services. [read post]
