Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 2,187
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2009, 12:29 pm
Class “B”- Eliminated by statute effective July 1, 1963. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 9:00 am
The Lebanon Family Division ruled that Muchmore had failed to meet his burden of proof with regard to each of the reasons for modification he cited, pursuant to 461-A:11; I(b), I(c), and I(d). [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 8:18 am
I’d like to join them with this scholarship! [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:38 pm
P. 9.430(d). 5 Fla. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:56 am
Ultimately, the Court must approve the plan as being the the best interests of the child or children. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:19 am
Group D seem like your worst jurors. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
" I'd never seen my kids' eyes grow so wide. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
App. 2009) (child care facility license); West v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
(b) Safe Harbors, Impersonation and Infringement. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 7:57 pm
., DRL 236 (B)(5)(d)(11), hereinafter referred to as “Factor 11”) is a term of art that has never been defined with any real precision, however. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 2:12 pm
(b) A short mention of what Gardasil is and why it was controversial back in 2006 when it was introduced, for those who haven’t closely followed it. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
Moritz Bälz: Japan’s Accession to the CISG – the English abstract reads as follows: On 1 July 2008 Japan, as the 71st state, acceded to the United Nations Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG). [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
D/B/A PUMP IT UP! [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am
The 14th Court of Appeals rejected all challenges against the arbitration award, the arbitration process, and the arbitrator, and affirmed the family court's order confirming the decision of the arbitrator - a former judge.M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O NIn this suit affecting the parent-child relationship, appellant, Lynn G., appeals from the trial court's order affirming a post-divorce arbitration award. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 2:37 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITBankruptcy
Bankruptcy Code §502(d) Does Not Apply to §503(b) Administrative Expenses Claims
In re: Ames Department Stores Inc. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 9:01 am
D. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:21 am
(c)(1) There is a rebuttable presumption that a custodian’s decision denying or limiting visitation to the petitioner is in the best interest of the child. (2) To rebut the presumption, the petitioner must prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following: (A) The petitioner has established a significant and viable relationship with the child for whom he or she is requesting visitation; and (B) Visitation with the petitioner is in the best… [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
The parents have abandoned the child b. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 11:33 pm
You’d think it’s normally not too difficult to prove that someone is your child or sibling, and you’d be correct, since usually USCIS only asks to see birth certificates (except for marriage cases because of the prevalence of fraud). [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 11:33 pm
You’d think it’s normally not too difficult to prove that someone is your child or sibling, and you’d be correct, since usually USCIS only asks to see birth certificates (except for marriage cases because of the prevalence of fraud). [read post]
