Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 5,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2021, 11:59 am
To paraphrase Joseph Heller, it's not paranoia if they're in fact after you. [read post]
18 May 2020, 2:19 pm
When you read cases from the nineteenth century, they're replete with legal formalism and focus on hypertechnical distinctions that are often found to be dispositive. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 3:45 pm
You end up in court and you have to deal with the hand that you got dealt.Whereas sometimes, like here, you're your own worst enemy.Ramakrishna Akella is a professor at UC Santa Cruz. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:43 pm
"So it's 5:30 in the morning, you've already had over 20 beers, and you're thinking: "Yeah, you know what I really need at this point? [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 12:49 pm
If you wanted to claim that your conduct was constitutionally protected, and hence that you're being SLAPPed, you should have done so when you were first sued. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 2:08 pm
So the Legislature bothered to set a relatively short (60 day) deadline for your typical attorney fee request, but if you're seeking postjudgment fees (as parties often do), there's no deadline -- much less a short one -- at all? [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 2:05 pm
But, on occasion, there's an element of "law porn" in which you're just fascinated by the underlying legal personalities.Like here.The doctrinal dispute is about the intersection between wrongful termination claims, mandatory contractual arbitration, and choice-of-arbitral-forum provisions (e.g., requiring arbitration outside of California for disputes involving California employees). [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 3:46 pm
When you're an attorney and the Court of Appeal repeatedly mentions your name in its opinion, that's rarely a good sign.The opinion's opening sentence gives you a sense of what the Court of Appeal's (understandable) attitude might be towards this case. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 12:18 pm
So now they're paying millions upon millions of dollars. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:28 am
") Under Justice Mihara's view, you're under a mandatory duty to notify the surety -- even after the correction -- and if you don't, the bond can't be forfeited even if the defendant later skips. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 11:42 am
So you're stuck paying for something you don't want.Whenever I think of cable television, I think of manifest market imperfection, and how our antitrust and other laws don't seem to capture whatever's going on here. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:50 pm
For example, the Court of Appeal holds that choice of law rulings are always subject to reconsideration (even without new facts or law) because they're just essentially preliminary in limine decisions. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 11:27 am
In re Quest Diagnostics (Fed. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 11:13 am
In Re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, No. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 11:56 am
App. 4th 830 (Cal. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 10:36 am
Or even to take a gander at Facebook or, if you're bold, hear what one of them has to say on Twitter, no less. [read post]
24 May 2007, 4:25 pm
., post larger signs, give handouts, etc.) and to have a more concrete plan about what to do in the event they're needed. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 9:55 am
Which is precisely what in fact transpired here.That said -- and that's all that need be said to resolve the case -- I think that if you're a proposed arbitrator and your girlfriend is the sister of defendant's lawyers, you need to say more than just: “[Defendant's lawyer] is a personal friend. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
(In re Jaime P., supra, 40 Cal.4th at p. 136.) [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:54 am
Cal. [read post]
