Search for: "In Re Marriage of Love"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 2,105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2008, 4:56 pm
/*So it is that historic family dynamics (rife with unresolved conflict) will more or less naturally play themselves out around the bed of a loved one who is -- or may be -- dying. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 10:57 pm
I went for my friend, and I could see why other women like this series and film, and how the non-material values it celebrates--love, friendship--well, they're good things, and in celebrating them, this movie is not at all that bad.So, while this may seem to be a tepid review, but it's more of an ambivalent one. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 10:52 am
Marriage and children. [read post]
27 May 2008, 1:09 am
And for all of that sex before marriage? [read post]
25 May 2008, 11:58 am
Nothing to do with it in some marriages, George. [read post]
22 May 2008, 3:34 am
California just ruled against the ban on same-sex marriage. [read post]
21 May 2008, 10:32 am
Turnipseed (Assistant Professor of Law, Syracuse University College of Law) has recently posted on SSRN an updated version of his article entitled How Do I Love Thee, Let Me Count the Days: Deathbed Marriages in America which also... [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:35 am
Let me offer a couple quibbles re: the fine-grained legal theory. [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:21 am
Multitasking card table We bought this standard folding table early in our marriage. [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:06 pm
The recent California same-sex marriage case, In re Marriage Cases, 2008 WL 2051892, has drawn a lot of coverage primarily on account of its consequences: same-sex marriage is coming to California, and unless the voters overturn the result by referendum, which is doubtful, it is there to stay. [read post]
17 May 2008, 9:53 am
The matrimonial proceedings were acrimonious.After her marriage broke up, Mrs. [read post]
15 May 2008, 11:57 am
Important but little-remarked fact: Of the eight Justices in the majorities in Goodridge (Massachusetts) and In re Marriage Cases (California), seven of them are Republican appointees. [read post]
15 May 2008, 11:45 am
That's what Loving, and loving, are all about. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:16 am
In re Marriage Cases, S147999 (May 15, 2008). [read post]
14 May 2008, 6:59 pm
You never think my contributions to this marriage are good enough! [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:30 pm
I'm getting word through the grapevine that the Supreme Court of California will announce its decision in In re Marriage Cases tomorrow at 10 AM. [read post]
13 May 2008, 9:40 am
People call these things imperfections, but they're not. [read post]
12 May 2008, 11:23 pm
"We think it would be wonderful if that were to happen, and we're going to continue to try to encourage that," Mr. [read post]
12 May 2008, 8:47 am
I still love absurd laws. [read post]
9 May 2008, 1:40 pm
Party owned the house before marriage. [read post]
