Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 5,434
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2015, 9:17 am
SCOV first notes that both prongs of the NRB rule must be satisfied: the program must be (1) undertaken by the state, and (2) used by the state. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:19 am
This distinction doesn’t exist outside First Amendment law. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
Bound by the First Amendment of the US Constitution, American courts have adopted what can be reasonably described as a fundamentalist approach to the value of freedom of expression. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 4:48 am
Because we liked the line about the "schoolhouse gate" when it helped us rule for Mary Beth Tiner, but we don't like it if it means students can exercise free speech about things that offend us.Day 1 is the rule. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
The reality of the most notorious virtual currency is that it is only a matter of time before it comes under the purview of a regulatory body. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 5:09 am
Once this consolidated rule goes into effect, including its Fourth Amendment to 11 NYCRR 65-3 (a/k/a Regulation 68-C), New York no-fault insurers will need to begin using the revised or "new" NYS Form NF-10. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
Newspaper Journalism and regulation GB News programmes presented by Conservative party members have been found to have broken Ofcom’s impartiality rules. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:36 am
Weiss Third parties are hereby given the opportunity to file written statements in accordance with Article 10 of the Rules of Procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal (OJ EPO 2007, 303 ff) in one of the official languages of the EPO (English, French or German). [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:56 am
(As Paul Gugliuzza and Mark Lemley have noted, ignoring the Rule 36 decisions can lead to a skewed sense of outcomes because the Fed. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:56 am
(As Paul Gugliuzza and Mark Lemley have noted, ignoring the Rule 36 decisions can lead to a skewed sense of outcomes because the Fed. [read post]
5 May 2019, 9:16 am
Mental Health America estimates that 5 to 10 percent of the nation’s 2700 death row inmates suffer from some form mental illness. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
This Conservative Appeals Court’s Rulings Are Testing the Supreme Court MSN – Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 10/26/2023 With a dozen judges nominated by Republican presidents, and only four by Democrats, the U.S. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm
” Id at 13. 1. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:10 pm
Lender did not appeal the order nor did either party file a relief from judgment or order, or a motion to alter or amend. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:32 am
The other practical matter is the amendment process, which would be needed to change the Constitution. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm
Given these rulings, the court did not have to reach Rule 23(b), but did anyway, finding issues such as the absence of predominance fatal under all three 23(b)(3) provisions. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
.#1 Significant changes to French patent lawThe new set of rules amend the French patent law on several aspects. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 7:52 am
In the preamble of the legislative resolution, the EP called “on the Commission to submit a proposal for amendment of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003, limited to the addition of a clause on forum necessitatis, as a matter of great urgency before the promised general review of that Regulation”. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 9:31 pm
Other highlights/low- lights of the amended FTC Rule are that: [T]he amended Rule requires more extensive disclosures on: lawsuits the franchisor has filed against franchisees; the franchisor’s use of so- called “confidentiality clauses” in lawsuit settlements; a warning when there is no exclusive territory; an explanation of what the term “renew- al” means for each franchise system . . . [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
