Search for: "John Does, 1-9" Results 1901 - 1920 of 3,580
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2012, 9:21 pm by CAPTAIN
The signature above it does not appear to be that of a Luana Alonso. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Of the 51 titles, the following titles have been enacted into positive (statutory) law: 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 17, 18, 23, 28, 31, 32, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 44, 46, 49, and 51. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:00 am by Hayley Evans
The panel has nine members drawn from both houses and who, subject to Section 1(1)(b) of the Official Secrets Act 1989, are given access to highly classified national security material in pursuit of their mandate. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
Which is why the Joint Committee on Human Rights is seeking to kick ass.Iain Dale continues: "This has all arisen after the despicable John Hirst (who served 25 years for axing a woman to death) took the issue to the Court of Human Rights. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 6:47 am by Jim Sedor
“It became known that if a company wanted to land a contract, it had to go through John,” said a former city council aide. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:19 am by Charon QC
That argument does not appeal to me in the least. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Scott Roehm
John Baker told the Senate Judiciary Committee last December, is the government’s “original sin, torture. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:00 am by Kenneth Anderson
 Maybe it’s correct and useful and not a “fallacy” at all; after all, John Mueller is also a smart guy and he doesn't think it's bad reasoning. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 12:18 pm by Unknown
Respectively [#18] Great Thunderbird Challenge for World's Archaeologists, Astronomers Archaeoastronomers: 1 Petroglyph 60 Stars! [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 5:39 pm by John Steele
UPDATE 1: I’m still working through the documents, but a striking irony already leaps out. [read post]