Search for: "Jordan v. Jordan"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 2,287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2024, 9:10 am
He covered topics like judicial vacancies, the need for Jordan timelines, and disinformation circulated about the Court’s R v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
INS v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
Last week in the courts On 9 May 2023, Nicklin J continued to hear the trial in the case of MBR Acres Ltd v Free MBR Beagles and Saini J continued to hear the trial in Packham CBE v Wightman and ors. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm
On 4 July 2018, Nicklin J heard an application in the case of BVC v EWF. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm
The Globe and Mail reports that psychologist Jordan Peterson is suing Wilfrid Laurier University following comments made about him during a disciplinary of one their staff members- the subject of the disciplinary had showed a video of one of Peterson’s lectures to a class. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
Jordan, 957 S.W.2d 815, 821 (Tenn. 1997) and Owens v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am
R v Peacock: Michael Peacock was charged under the Obscene Publications Act 1959. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 6:58 am
-Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no writ); Jordan v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:11 am
Ryan v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am
Whomever Trump selects, “aides inside the West Wing feel excited about the Supreme Court pick, viewing it as a chance for Trump to score a victory,” reports Jordan Fabian of The Hill. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:47 pm
Also in the justices’ guest box is Jordan Lorence of Alliance Defending Freedom. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 1:30 pm
The Court held in Bowen v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 9:19 am
(relisted after the April 20, April 27, May 10, May 17 and May 24 conferences) Jordan v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
Edith Wilmans of Dallas—to hear the case of Johnson v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 5:51 am
Jordan v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:19 am
(Citing Jules Jordan Video, Inc. v. 144942 Can. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
