Search for: "LaBelle v. LaBelle"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 12,166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2007, 11:19 am
The RIAA has filed a motion to dismiss the defendants' two (2) counterclaims, one for copyright misuse, the other for breach of duty to warn, in Elektra v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:11 pm
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 9:52 am
The RIAA has backed down in a Jackson, Mississippi, case, Elektra v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 5:04 pm
A number of the defendants in Tanya Andersen's class action, Andersen v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 2:49 am
The Court has entered judgment against the RIAA for the $68,685.23 in attorneys fees it awarded to the prevailing defendant, in Capitol v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 5:14 am
Some four years after first serving a subpoena on Verizon, the RIAA has served a new subpoena duces tecum (subpoena for documents) in UMG v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 4:32 pm
Risan claims that “artistic operators” made changes to parameters such as pitch, loudness, rhythm, timbre, and space, Defendants’ conduct appears to be substantively no different than the defendants in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 11:37 am
Milwaukee Social Democratic Publishing Co. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 10:34 am
In Best v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:28 pm
Guidance Endodontics, LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 6:10 pm
It's second hand and not for attribution, but it's the first thing approaching a blow-by-blow we've seen on the Wyeth v. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 11:15 am
That is the issue in McMesson Canada Corp. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
Such was the case in Bock v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:52 am
Nelson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 1:18 pm
Co. of Connecticut v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:28 am
In Forcellati v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:25 am
Gustavson v. [read post]
Settlements allowing competitors to use term doesn't insulate Clorox from its own possible deception
13 Feb 2018, 8:02 am
Gregorio v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:57 am
Sheiner v. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 6:07 am
Thomas (renamed Capitol v. [read post]
