Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2022, 5:03 pm
Tuitt—Nonhuman Rights Project v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
The House of Lords report from the Select Committee on Communications entitled “UK advertising in a digital age” provides useful context. [read post]
21 May 2015, 7:33 am
Supreme Court Decision By a 4-1 majority (Lord Toulson dissenting), the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 3:58 am
On 7 February 2025, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) heard argument over the release to the media of documents from the case of H6 v Secretary of State for the Home Department (SC/205/2023). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Ad [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:51 am
In the courts: Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 (23 March 2011): Secret foreign nationals detention policy which contradicted published policy was “serious abuse of power”. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
As the Telegraph reports, details of Lord Mandelson’s visit to a Siberian steam ‘banya‘ were disclosed during Rothschild v Associated Newspapers, heard last week by Tugendhat J, without a jury. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:00 am
The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland), heard 8-9 March 2016. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 4:32 am
The rule of law objection to vagueness was spelt out by the House of Lords in R v Rimmington, citing the US case of Grayned:"Vagueness offends several important values … A vague law impermissibly delegates basic policy matters to policemen, judges and juries for resolution on an ad hoc and subjective basis, with the attendant dangers of arbitrary and discriminatory application. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 9:09 am
He must not consciously mis-state the facts. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:01 am
In the UK House of Lords decision of Blathwayt v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:46 am
Lord Justice Lloyd and Lord Justice Elias both gave concurring judgments. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
Panetta (Al-Awlaki v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
In Kilby et al. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:18 pm
In Caparo v Dickman Lord Bridge cautioned against discussing duties of care in abstract terms divorced from factual context: “It is never sufficient to ask simply whether A owes B a duty of care. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
It is now clear that the subjects in charge of collecting the fair compensation for private copying (e.g. collective management organisations) can bring proceedings before the courts of the Member State where the harm arising from missed payments is felt. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:04 am
Lady Justice Smith stated that it was possible in principle for an estoppel by res judicata to be created by a Tomlin Order, although it would often be more difficult to determine precisely what issues had been compromised, as the terms of a Tomlin Order would not be made public. [read post]
