Search for: "Lowe v. United States" Results 1901 - 1920 of 4,753
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2012, 9:15 am by David Post
  of a work that have been acquired outside the United States is an infringement of the exclusive right to distribute copies [of the work] [subject to certain exceptions not relevant here]. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 12:56 pm by Zachary Burdette, Quinta Jurecic
The United States formally confirmed that it made a “mistake” in accidently striking Syrian regime forces instead of Islamic State fighters on September 17th, the BBC tells us. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by John Elwood
United States, 16-5046, challenges both our spellcheck software and our ability to resist obvious jokes. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 8:51 am by Jeff Lowe
Louis and Illinois, the Lowe Law Firm represents people across the United States who were seriously injured after taking a medication they thought they could trust. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:47 pm by Florian Mueller
While Ericsson and Apple easily agreed upon David Folsom, former Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, as their mediator, the dispute isn't ripe for settlement. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:44 pm by Julia Stein
In articulating these principles, rather than relying on Chevron, the California Supreme Court drew on the United States Supreme Court’s earlier decision in Skidmore v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:20 am
GuestKat Peter Ling reports on this interesting decision.Richard Vary provides a guest contribution, in which he looks into the recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, which overturned a decision issued in December 2017 by Judge Selna in the Central District of California, instead going to a jury trial.Trade MarksGuestKat Léon Dijkman looks at the recent Opinion of Advocate General Bobek in Primart… [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm by New York Criminal Defense
 With apologies for citation format, then:“Presumptions must be carefully scrutinized before they will be allowed to operate against an accused since there is a real and substantial possibility that they will conflict with the overriding, more fundamental presumption of innocence accorded to every defendant” (Leary v United States, 395 US 6). [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm by Donald Thompson
 With apologies for citation format, then:“Presumptions must be carefully scrutinized before they will be allowed to operate against an accused since there is a real and substantial possibility that they will conflict with the overriding, more fundamental presumption of innocence accorded to every defendant” (Leary v United States, 395 US 6). [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 10:20 am by Sital Kalantry
  The United States, on the other hand, is correct not tolerate human rights abuses in the United States even if it would be permissible in the home country of the diplomat. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:59 am by Jack Goldsmith
  One little discussed but important question in this vein is what policies the United States should pursue in regulating the global market in zero days. [read post]