Search for: "MATTER OF K A B" Results 1901 - 1920 of 2,720
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2011, 8:20 am by AdamSmith1776
If you assume the requirement of bar passage is equally distributed across all reported jobs, you arrive at the dismal statistic that barely 36% of all graduates held a (a) permanent (b) full-time job (c) requiring bar passage. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Whether the lawyers should have gone public with their concerns, blowing the whistle on their client, remains a matter of debate. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:02 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Traumatic C5-6 right cervical disk herniation with cord effacement; b. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:33 am by Robert A. Epstein
  For instance, if the payor spouse is required by his employer to contribute $30,000 per year towards his 401(k), should such money be included in that spouse's income in determining support? [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 2:34 am by John L. Welch
If it seeks review of the Board's decision under 15 USC 1071(b), it can submitted additional evidence. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:50 pm
The court looked to Indiana Code 35-41-1-1(b), which states that Indiana has jurisdiction if conduct or a result that is an element of the crime occurred in Indiana. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:39 am
Well, it’s Wednesday and I’m just coming up for air for a few moments to finish this blog post before I dig back in to merger matters. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
" The Campbells also appeal from the trial court's summary judgment in their legal malpractice claim against William B. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
" The Campbells also appeal from the trial court's summary judgment in their legal malpractice claim against William B. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
In response to certified questions, the New York Court of Appeals held that (a) proceeds of a fraud could constitute marital property, and (b) when part or all of the marital estate consisted of the proceeds of fraud, that fact did not, as a matter of law, preclude a determination that a spouse paid fair consideration according to the terms of New York's Debtor and Creditor Law section 272. [read post]