Search for: "Mays v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 2,255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2012, 5:45 am
"The 2nd Circuit said school administrators must maintain parental confidence in their ability to shield children from frightening behavior and to protect safety. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:59 am
The European Court of Justice ruled that Britain was wrong to restrict social security payments to the wives of three men on a list of people with alleged links to al-Qaeda, the Taleban and Osama bin Laden. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 10:46 am
Brehm v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 10:50 am
During his testimony, the plaintiff admitted that he was undocumented, and that he had submitted a fraudulent Social Security card to City Wide at the time he was hired. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 12:00 pm
During his testimony, the plaintiff admitted that he was undocumented, and that he had submitted a fraudulent Social Security card to City Wide at the time he was hired. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
” MAY The U.S. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 3:46 am
Johnson enacted) the "Social Security Amendments of 1965," which created the Medicare and Medicaid programs.[6] When first established, the Medicare and Medicaid programs were placed under the overall authority of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW).[7] Two of the subordinate organization under HEW as that time were the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Social and Rehabilitation Service (SRS). [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
” The Department of Justice and the Obama administration have joined with the FBI. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
This combination includes: (i) the extraordinary value-creation opportunities within the company’s business model presented by AI; (ii) the complexity (and often opacity) of the underlying technology, especially when compared with existing data and information systems currently applied or under development by the company; (iii) the social, legal, compliance, ethical, and privacy issues that AI use presents – as well as its implications for international competitiveness and… [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:53 pm
" For example, despite protests from many expert technologists, the House passed a cyber-security bill (CISPA). [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
In crafting such an elegant split of the Obamacare baby, the well-respected Judge Sutton may well have preempted a Democratic filibuster of his potential elevation to the Supreme Court, but in siding with the government he may have simultaneously lessened the chance of being nominated in the first place. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL’s efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal’s ‘one-size-fits-all’ fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims – ActionAid’s unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General… [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:34 am
That's the form on which you list your exempt property, and it's one of the forms listed at the Official Forms site maintained by the Administrative Offices of the U.S. [read post]
10 May 2016, 10:21 am
The Constitution of 1988 took the morality issue so seriously that, according to article 85(V), the president of the Republic may be criminally charged and lose his/her mandate in case of acts against administrative probity. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:33 am
For example, the legislative history for the 1976 Copyright Act states that “‘choreographic works’ do not include social dance steps and simple routines. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 8:34 am
The point is that it isn’t easy and may not happen at all, but if it does, the effects are lasting and hard to undo. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 2:20 pm
On May 2007, the Trump administration agreed to appoint Robert S. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 4:28 am
V. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 7:56 am
[6] See Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]