Search for: "Mitchell v. Mitchell" Results 1901 - 1920 of 3,054
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2012, 10:56 am by Courtney Minick
The Iowa Supreme Court ruled on the First Amendment and its Free Exercise clause in Mitchell County v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:56 am by Courtney Minick
The Iowa Supreme Court ruled on the First Amendment and its Free Exercise clause in Mitchell County v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:55 pm by Duncan Calow
Reposted from DLA Piper's Media Intelligence Bulletin Editorial Team: Nick Fitzpatrick, Duncan Calow and Patrick Mitchell Peter Frampton has filed a lawsuit against Universal Music Group ("Universal Music") in respect of unpaid music royalties. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:32 pm by Orin Kerr
Copyright protection in the United States was “effectively unavailable for pornography” until the landmark decision by the Fifth Circuit in Mitchell Brothers Film Group v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:02 am by Mitchell Boyarsky
Mitchell Boyarsky is a Director in the Gibbons Employment & Labor Law Department. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:39 am by Rob Robinson
” | Williams Mullen – bit.ly/yVP7EM (Monica McCarroll, Stephen Anthony) Ooops, They Did it Again – Jurors Continue to Improperly Use Internet, and Courts Struggle with Solutions – bit.ly/wmffPX (Gibbons) Pippins Court Affirms Need for Cooperation and Proportionality in eDiscovery – bit.ly/AuGsUO (Philip Favro) Planning is Key in Corporate Fraud Risk Management – bit.ly/x02ZBG (Catherine Dunn) SOPA and PIPA Have Been Shelved | eDiscovery Law Alert –… [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 11:36 pm by Record on Appeal
On January 24, 2012, the Hawaii Supreme Court accepted cert in Charles Mitchell Hart and Lisa Marie Hart v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 11:25 am by Emma Durand-Wood
At the BC Injury Lawyers Blog, Waterstone Law Group lawyer Kim Briscoe wrote about the recent BCCA decision in Fan v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:04 am by Madelaine Lane
The Court vacated the September 2, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals and remanded Mitchell v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:07 am by New Books Script
K 487 E3 N48 1998 V.3 The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law / edited by Peter Newman. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm by NL
Para 53.4 of the Practice Direction to Rule 48 states:It is appropriate for the court to make a wasted costs order against a legal representative, only if – (1)the legal representative has acted improperly, unreasonably or negligently; (2)his conduct has caused a party to incur unnecessary costs, and (3)it is just in all the circumstances to order him to compensate that party for the whole or part of those costs.The notes to the PD in the White Book raise Saif Ali v Sydney… [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm by NL
Para 53.4 of the Practice Direction to Rule 48 states:It is appropriate for the court to make a wasted costs order against a legal representative, only if – (1)the legal representative has acted improperly, unreasonably or negligently; (2)his conduct has caused a party to incur unnecessary costs, and (3)it is just in all the circumstances to order him to compensate that party for the whole or part of those costs.The notes to the PD in the White Book raise Saif Ali v Sydney… [read post]