Search for: "Park v State"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 11,295
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2020, 10:53 am
There has been no legal response from the Center yet, but there was an affidavit from the Center's pastor, swearing that Sunday's service was "consistent with CDC guidelines," and everyone was instructed to (1) park their cars at least six feet apart, (2) remain in the car for the entire service (underlined), and (3) keep car windows at least half way up for the entire service. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Coalition for an Equitable Westlake/MacArthur Park v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 1:45 pm
As discussed here, in the landmark June 2019 decision of Marchand v. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 6:53 pm
In On Fire Christian Center, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 1:17 pm
Jacobson v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:28 pm
Even many federal and state agencies have subpoena power, though generally with a limited scope. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 8:00 am
Fuentes v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:56 pm
Finally, the Bill states that any language in a first-party insurance policy that conflicts with the Bill’s language is void as against public Policy. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm
On April 2, 2020, the Second Appellate District Court of Appeal (Division 5) filed its published opinion in Coalition for an Equitable Westlake/MacArthur Park v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 8:00 am
Thomas v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:17 am
Houdek v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 5:02 am
From Cook v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 8:00 am
Gemme v. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 7:51 am
The Court ruled that the Park was a public forum and that the rules which prohibited free speech and petitions in the Park violated the right to free speech under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.GeorgiaKatamadze v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:40 pm
Taking care of pets; and v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 12:57 pm
About the Authors: Stephen V. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 12:57 pm
About the Authors: Stephen V. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:23 am
As Justice Brown wrote, then of the Superior Court of Justice, in Bank of Montreal v Faibish, 2014 ONSC 2178, “Why should we be able to expect that treating courts like some kind of fossilized Jurassic Park will enable them to continue to provide a most needed service to the public in a way the public respects? [read post]
