Search for: "Patrick v. State"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 2,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Landry, La., 04-C-3967-D, 10/14/2010 Patrick C. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:43 pm
The settlement resolves a class action lawsuit, Hutchinson v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:02 am
The judgment was upheld on appeal in 2008, United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm
Garza, as well as a number of important cases in state or circuit courts.) [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
Damian Patrick Case Page State of Maryland v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:50 am
"See a list of ILB entries on the Court of Appeals decision in the case of Morrison v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 2:58 pm
Agency for International Development v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 5:12 am
The circuit’s precedent in Patrick v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am
” At Notice & Comment, David Rubenstein argues that United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:03 am
Patrick Parrish. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:23 am
Covering travel ban litigation, Jane summarized the oral arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 12:15 pm
Patrick McDonnell summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Collins v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:44 am
Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 11:17 am
The Supreme Court's ruling this past summer in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:22 am
The Department also has available to it a portion of certain fraud prevention and detection fees charged to applicants for H- and L- category visas. 8 U.S.C. 1356(v)(2)(A). [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 2:50 am
Case Name: Roeschlein v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 2:34 am
Case Name: Abeyta v. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 5:44 am
Kerin, Senior Assistant Public Defender.Representing Appellee (Plaintiff): Patrick J. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am
At LifeSiteNews, Patrick Mahoney announces that the Supreme Court has agreed to allow screening of a pro-life movie, “Voiceless,” on the sidewalk in front of the court building; organizers of the event state that “this is the first time the Supreme Court has ever permitted a film to be shown in front of the Court. [read post]
