Search for: "People v Comfort" Results 1901 - 1920 of 2,227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 12:48 pm by Peter Margulies
From the comfort of hindsight, it is tempting to assert that such grievous harm should surely result in criminal prosecutions. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Perhaps this next Supreme Court term, in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This is bound up with rules v. standards. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm by Howard Knopf
That said, it was comforting to users, if they did not ask too many inconvenient questions, such as whether AC was providing an unlicensed insurance scheme.Notably, the Board accepted key CMEC’s submissions on fairness with respect to copying from books. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Some studies rely on parents’ reporting; not persuasive v. studies where a doctor confirms that the event occurred. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am by Stephen Page
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(This is the classic nuisance case of Spur Industries v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
And, as is usual in these matters, it is not the officials but rather people (individuals and communities) who are left to pay the bill. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm by Graham Smith
A state that enjoyed all those powers would be truly totalitarian, even if the authorities had the best interests of its people at heart. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm by Graham Smith
A state that enjoyed all those powers would be truly totalitarian, even if the authorities had the best interests of its people at heart. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
He finds First Amendment invocations mystical; prefers the Mastercard v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 2:17 pm by Patricia Hughes
[See CTV News Story here and decision in Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:58 am by SCOTUStalk
This is Tom Goldstein and Justice David Souter in Georgia v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
II Although Trump has so far been checked in his attempts to remake democratic, there’s no reason to get too comfortable. [read post]