Search for: "People v Johnson"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 2,762
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
"(People v Wlasiuk,#102275 decided December 29, 2011). [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:22 am
Webster v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:11 am
The Court of Appeals has repeatedly held that a prospective juror with actual bias, such as an opinion that the defendant is guilty, is qualified to serve on a jury as long as gives an unequivocal assurance she can be fair and impartial (People v Nicholas, 98 NY2d 749, 751 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600, 614 [2000]). [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
” Barlow’s letter encapsulated the reasoning behind the idea of copyright as an incentive to promote knowledge: literary and intellectual works took a considerable amount of time and resources to produce, and given the great public benefits that flow from them, some way of encouraging people to devote their time and resources to producing them was needed. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 7:20 am
House of Representatives Related posts “Congressman Seeks to Send Critic to Jail” (0) Wyeth v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 12:00 am
NY - PEOPLE v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:59 am
Nick Clegg said in a rather unwise comment that he abhorred overpaid people getting paid too much. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:03 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:37 am
In State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:57 am
See also, Jones v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
Journalism and the PCC There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but four “resolved” complaints: Information Affairs Authority of Bahrain v The Independent, Clause 1, 14 December 2011 ; Mrs Kate Adams-Moor v The People, Clause 1, 13/12/2011; Brent Council v Kilburn Times Clause 1, 2, 12/12/2011; Mr Will Knock v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/12/2011. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 11:03 am
Their problem was that previous case-law (Johnson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:54 am
America, on the other hand, had full blown slavery for about a century after she got her independence, and did not enact comprehensive civil rights legislation until the Johnson administration. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:08 pm
Johnson, 157 S.W.3d 856, 860-61 (Tex. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:55 pm
” So, Move to Amend is also looking to overturn the 1976 Buckley v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:20 am
Johnson, the Supreme Court’s decision last year overruling State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:16 am
See, e.g., The Law Practice of Alexander Hamilton: Documents and Commentary 811 (Julius Goebel ed. 1981) (reprinting Alexander Hamilton’s defense argument in People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
California v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:31 am
People v. [read post]
