Search for: "People v. Cross"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 5,673
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
The States that have sought to intervene in Ukraine v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Unless a convention of the states assembled pursuant to Article V proceeds to ignore the language of Article V, the current structure of the Senate cannot be changed, and even permissible amendments will need the assent of 38 states. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:24 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Ward v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:25 am
People v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
It’s a cross-regulatory problem. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
But the Court’s religiosity also emerges in nominally non-religion controversies, including Dobbs v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Supreme Court, May 12, 2008 Gonzales v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:48 pm
Here are some highlights from this week’s innocence-related media: A Racial Pattern So Obvious, Even the Supreme Court Might See ItFlowers v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:16 pm
Judicial Watch obtained the documents pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed on January 3, 2011 (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 4:58 am
Are we ready to cross that bridge and pray it won’t fall down? [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:45 am
In 1868, the Court of Common Pleas heard the case of Chorlton v Lings where, as was feared by some MPs, it was argued that the Interpretation Act 1850 provided the term “man” in the Representation of the People Act 1867 “shall be deemed and taken to include females … unless the contrary is expressly provided” and meant that women who otherwise met the eligibility requirements could vote. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:01 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 6:41 pm
In Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 4:22 am
, in People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:37 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
The petitioner was convicted of killing three people, including one who was raped before being killed. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:48 am
In Shaughnessy v. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
The hundreds of federal agencies that employ millions of people barely appear in the book. [read post]
