Search for: "People v. Sample"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 1,949
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2007, 5:05 pm
By Eric Goldman New Mexico v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 9:31 am
" Put another way, people's preconceived notions about whether the Court is a politically-oriented entity or whether it is "above politics" impact the responses that people have to the ads. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 11:41 pm
, Spitzer v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 11:27 am
If you are a member of the judiciary and wish to add your credibility to the project by letting us shamelessly use your name, please put the word "judge" in the title line of your email ...Pavel Pinkava's petition for leave to appeal against the Court of Appeal's ruling in LIFFE v Pinkava (judgment here; IPKat post here) has just been refused by the House of Lords. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 9:16 pm
Her line of handbags, Claire V., was conceived on a trip to Cambodia as a way of aiding its impoverished people, and the bags are crafted by survivors of land mine injuries. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:23 am
Tanner v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:10 am
Giving them free samples allows them to provide these samples to patients at little or no cost, whether for on- or off-label use. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 5:37 pm
One problem: the summary did not list that another, un-charged male's DNA was located in the samples tested. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 4:50 pm
Today the Court of Appeals held that a criminal defendant waives a statute of limitations defense by pleading guilty - People v Parilla, 2007 NY Slip Op 05133. [read post]
24 May 2007, 6:31 am
People v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
Rasmussen, "The Story of Case v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 10:37 pm
The TechnoLlama was first to let the IPKat know what the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit did last week in Perfect 10 v Amazon.com and Google Inc (full text of the judgment here).Left: not the TechnoLlama but the DeliLlamaThis decision is a must-read decision for anyone who is concerned with the development of copyright doctrine in the field of cached thumbnails. [read post]
15 May 2007, 9:20 pm
Hustler v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 9:40 am
Divided Supreme Court of the State of Washington affirms murder conviction of defendant tricked into providing DNA sample by police investigators who were impersonating lawyers: Today's ruling in State of Washington v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 3:13 pm
See Doe v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 7:34 am
People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:28 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), April 29, 2007
Categories Included: Corrections Law, Criminal Procedure Law, Judiciary Law and Penal Law. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 5:27 am
Some courts have, for “inaccessible” data, accepted sampling. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
That was the question addressed by the New York State Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 5:13 pm
The expectation is that reviews will be positive, and the only compensation is free use of the website.A: We have thought about noncash compensation, like coupons or free samples. [read post]
