Search for: "People v. White"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 7,175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 4:49 pm
White, ... 2. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:33 am
And as a legal matter, Brown v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:34 am
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 2:14 pm
White and Hoffa v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
App. 1986); People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 am
The employee was replaced by a white woman. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 10:17 am
* Clarks v. [read post]
23 Mar 2006, 1:13 pm
• 4 flowers in each box (flowers weren't always in the same pattern)• 100 total flowers in red boxes• 84 little white boxes on ceiling• 40 long white flowers in 20 blue boxes on ceiling• Blue squares w/ flowers in each of 4 corners• 6 lights in blue boxes on ceiling• 30 little blue boxes with white flowers (not counting corners or lights) in… [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm
In the post-war South, white southern Democrats used felony disenfranchisement to deny those rights, invoking historical similarities between the legal statuses of slaves and convicts as justification.Today, according to a report by the Sentencing Project, nearly 40% of the 6.1 million people disenfranchised by a felony conviction are black.Despite the troubled association of felony disenfranchisement laws with racial discrimination, courts, like the 2002 Florida court, generally… [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:45 pm
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Downey v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 3:58 am
The text "guilty of misleading the American public" was at issue in the Lanham Act case Groden v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1… [read post]
29 May 2012, 12:21 pm
People v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:32 am
Cardwell v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:10 am
Yesterday in Liberty University, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:27 am
The Maryland Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed a jury award against the Baltimore City Police Department in Houghton v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Connecticut or Roe v. [read post]
