Search for: "ROYAL V. STATE"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 2,233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Bowker v Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, heard 21 October 2010 (Sharp J). [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm
The cases involved a man and a woman who had been dismissed by the Royal Air Force and 2 men who had been dismissed by the Royal Navy for being homosexual (see, respectively, Smith And Grady v United Kingdom and Lustig-Prean and Beckett v UK; also, the 2002 case of Beck, Copp and Bazeley v UK). [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
The Greaves v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
The FreeCycle Network (IPBiz) (IP Spotlight) District Court E D North Carolina grants defendant summary judgment on federal and state law trade mark infringement claims in The Daniel Group v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
Bowker v Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, heard 21 October 2010 (Sharp J). [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 5:45 am
Co. v Royal Ins., 282 AD2d 864, 865 [2001]). [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:04 am
Continuing the food-related nature of our posts on Art. 8, ECHR cases (see, inter alia, here and here) we’ve got a bit of cold borscht from Ukraine in the case of Kryvitska and Kryvitskyy v Ukraine App. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:24 am
In contrast to Morgan Stanley and Medimmune and consistent with America Online, Citigroup and Royal Bank of Scotland, the majority in Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
There is a world of difference between illustrating how a powerful country like the United States conducts its diplomacy and a News of the World reporter seeking royal tittle-tattle. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm
In R. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 11:59 am
The factual background in Starglade Properties v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 7:45 am
Supreme Court Holland v Revenue and Customs & Anor [2010] UKSC 51 (24 November 2010) MA (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 49 (24 November 2010) Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Wilson & Anor (Scotland) [2010] UKSC 50 (24 November 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 4:38 pm
Bowker v Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, heard 21 October 2010 (Sharp J). [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 10:09 pm
Royal Sovereign Corp., 21 F.3d 1558, 1568 (Fed. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:50 am
State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm
Everyone else should be too. 15 December 2010, at Royal College of Surgeons. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm
Everyone else should be too. 15 December 2010, at Royal College of Surgeons. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:41 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Plymouth City Council v G (Children) [2010] EWCA Civ 1271 (10 November 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Cairns v Modi [2010] EWHC 2859 (QB) (10 November 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Rycroft, R (on the application of) v The Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain [2010] EWHC 2832 (Admin) (10 November 2010) Royal College of Nursing & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of… [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
The Royal College of Nursing & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2010] EWHC 2761 (Admin) (10 November 2010) – Read judgment The High Court has ruled that a scheme which prohibits people convicted or cautioned for certain crimes from working with children or vulnerable adults breaches human rights law. [read post]