Search for: "Rules for Court Reporters"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 91,786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2014, 9:07 am
[JURIST] A Cairo court ruled on Tuesday that the Palestinian Islamist movement Hamas [JURIST news archive] is a terrorist organization and banned all activities by the group in Egypt. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 10:04 am
There are no exceptions in the statute for reporting the actual number of wiretaps authorized by the courts. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:40 pm
"Supreme Court Rules Against Freezing Assets Not Tied to Crimes": Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 5:35 am
Although this ruling technically has no direct influence in Florida, it’s well-established that state supreme courts will look to sister courts when weighing similar issues, so it’s worthwhile to take a look at the legal reasoning in this case. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 6:00 am
As I have previously reported, these amendments were the result of a long period of analysis, study and public comment spearheaded by the Advisory Committee on Rules for Publication of Court of Appeal Opinions. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
The Cherry decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2008/2008_07660.htm NYPPL comments concerning The Rule of Three The Rule of Three has been the subject of much litigation. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 4:15 am
In India on Tuesday, the Orissa High Court ruled that every Hindu, regardless of caste, has the right to enter any Hindu Temple. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:45 am
The court ultimately ruled that Bitcoins were a medium of exchange and that the defendant’s business of exchanging Bitcoins for cash required him to register as a money transmitter and payment instrument seller. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 10:15 am
From the AP report in the Santa Fe New Mexican: " A federal appeals court ruled Friday that the Interior Department must account for century-old land royalties owed to American Indians, reversing a lower court's ruling that the task is... [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 7:50 am
On Sunday, we reported on an eleventh-hour district court order striking down large portions of the NLRB’s new representation election rules that were set to go into effect on May 31, 2020. [read post]
4 Sep 2021, 7:46 am
“Supreme Court ruling on Texas law was the result of decades of pressure from anti-abortion groups to shape the court”: Tierney Sneed of CNN has this report. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 7:22 pm
“Activists: Supreme Court’s precedent changing rulings could sway courts on right to vote in D.C. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
"Court Cash: 2016 Election Money Resulting Directly From Supreme Court Rulings. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:03 am
“Supreme Court ruling could upend thousands of deportation cases, sowing chaos in court”: Daniel González of The Arizona Republic has this report. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 9:38 am
" The Dallas Morning News reports that "Supreme Court throws out court-drawn Texas redistricting maps. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 1:31 pm
We have previously explained that adverse event reports are not reliable evidence, and the court’s ruling is simply wrong. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 10:27 am
“Voting Rights Ruling Follows US Supreme Court ‘Bat Signal’; Ending private Voting Rights Act suits was raised by justices; High court may not be sold on ruling against advocates”: Jacqueline Thomsen and Suzanne Monyak of Bloomberg Law have this report. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 8:00 pm
“Supreme Court’s conservative rulings left mark on election results; The court’s ruling on abortion and guns helped energize Democrats, while decisions on redistricting might have aided Republicans”: Lawrence Hurley of NBC News has this report. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 9:32 am
“SC’s 6-week abortion ban is unconstitutional, state Supreme Court rules”: Maayan Schechter and Zak Koeske of The State of Columbia, South Carolina have this report. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 3:00 pm
A fine ruling on panhandling from New York State's highest court: The Associated Press reports that "Top NY court upholds fines for some panhandling. [read post]
