Search for: "Russell, Appeal of"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 2,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2010, 8:04 am
Holder Docket: 09-992 Issue: Whether the Sixth Circuit erred under the “ordinary remand rule” — which provides that a court of appeals which finds error must generally remand to the relevant agency for further consideration – when it did not remand this case to the Board of Immigration Appeals after finding that the agency had applied an incorrect legal standard in determining whether the ”persecutor bar” of 8 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 8:09 am
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Lubrizol Enterprises v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 8:08 am
In an unusual move, the federal trial court dismissed the lawsuit, and Fallon promptly appealed the decision to the 3rd Circuit. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit affirmed. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, in Boston. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 8:29 am
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 3:52 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 3:59 am
The bad news Insofar as owning a property through a limited company, the Judge in the First Tier Tribunal case here re 49 Russell Hill Road, was of the option that a director could not be personally liable. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the co-counsel to the petitioner in Pleau.] [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:10 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 6:44 am
The commission asked the Court of Appeals to overturn Brain’s ruling that allowed the higher caps to take effect on September 13. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm
Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents the petitioners in this case, which is listed without regard for the likelihood that it will be granted. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 1:46 pm
Russell – i.e. that a disability plan participant entitled to a specified benefit could not bring suit under 502(a)(2) to recover consequential damages arising from delay in processing her claim. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm
Learjet, Inc. 13-271Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case.Issue: Whether the Natural Gas Act, which occupies the field as to matters within its scope, preempts state-law claims challenging industry practices that directly affect the wholesale natural gas market when those claims are asserted by litigants who purchased gas in retail… [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
" The names will be unsealed by Feb. 7 at 5 pm, unless an appeal is filed. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
” Russell on Crimes, an authoritative treatise originally published in 1819, defines bribery as “the receiving or offering [of] any undue reward by or [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Titan Corp.Docket: 09-1313Issue(s): 1) Whether the court of appeals erred by finding that claims for torture and other war crimes cannot be brought against private actors under the Alien Tort Statute; and 2) whether the court of appeals erred by creating a “battle-field preemption” doctrine that extends derivative sovereign immunity to contractors.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (DC Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief of CACI International in oppositionBrief… [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Russell, for AGAR Corporation, Inc., Petitioner. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
Notably, the Supreme Court in positing the defense in Russell, denied that it precluded prosecution in [read post]
