Search for: "STATE v. SULLIVAN" Results 1901 - 1920 of 2,476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Similarly, a statement by a CNN spokesperson argued that, “the impulsive and unjustified suspension of a number of reporters, including CNN’s Donie O’Sullivan, is concerning but not surprising. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Also for The Post, Sean Sullivan and others report that “Sens. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 11:34 am
References: Charges the Government Expects to File in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 6:55 am by INFORRM
 It was strongly supported by Libel Reform campaigners – who nevertheless remained unhappy at the absence of a “New York Times v Sullivan” libel defence. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:25 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Prominent historical examples, like the liberal justices who advanced press freedom in New York Times v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:27 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Prominent historical examples, like the liberal justices who advanced press freedom in New York Times v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:21 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Palin is, of course, a public figure, so under the landmark 1964 precedent of New York Times v. [read post]
29 Nov 2024, 6:36 am by jonathanturley
The status imposes the higher standard first imposed in New York Times v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 8:36 pm by Tom Smith
Andrew Sullivan, for example, put the objection this way: “The replacement will be chosen only after the field is radically winnowed by open race and sex discrimination, which have gone from being illegal to being celebrated and practiced by a president of the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 1:28 am by Transplanted Lawyer
The law would seem to support my initial reaction: New York Times v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
I just received this memo from our friends at Sullivan & Cromwell discussing the release. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:47 am by Peter Mahler
The District Court’s opinion tells the story of peripatetic litigation over the implementation of the buy-sell agreements’ poorly conceived appraisal provisions that, like Gilbert and Sullivan’s wandering minstrel, “tuned its supple song” as the case journeyed from Michigan state court across the border to Indiana state court and then Indiana federal court. [read post]
22 May 2025, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Sullivan (1991), purported to reaffirm that principle but in doing so arguably weakened it. [read post]