Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2015, 7:23 am
United States, Assistant to the Solicitor General Ann O’Connell drew that straw. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:25 pm
We also saw the same divide in recent cases like North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am
United States (7-2 per Roberts). [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 9:15 am
The case is United State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm
United States in 2001); and even one’s own front porch (Florida v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
In commentary at CNN International, Aaron Carroll weighs in, describing this Term as “a pivotal moment for the Supreme Court, for politics, and for the future of health care reform in the United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:48 am
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case in which the lower court held that the defendant could not prove that he was prejudiced by his attorney’s erroneous advice to plead guilty, which resulted in mandatory deportation, because the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
This Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:18 am
;United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am
That is the justification often offered for cases like Griswold and Lawrence.Because of two early decisions, the Slaughterhouse Cases and United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 8:25 am
” EEOC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 11:42 am
Baum’s primary interest is in courts in the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:53 am
United States compels a finding that Section 16(b) is unconstitutional. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:04 am
United States (1997), Justice Antonin Scalia said that a federal gun control law that forced local law enforcement to perform handgun background checks went against the 10th Amendment’s principles. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:54 am
United States and Ortiz v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 6:38 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:21 am
That provision renders non-citizens inadmissible to the U.S. if the deciding consular or other government official "knows, or has reasonable ground to believe" that the non-citizen "seeks to enter the United States to engage solely, principally, or incidentally in any . . . unlawful activity. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am
United States, Merit Management Group v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm
In Johnson v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am
Muskrat v. [read post]
