Search for: "Stanford Law Communications" Results 1901 - 1920 of 2,446
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2011, 3:28 pm by Bill Otis
  I did some of it as a Stanford Law student, and, as I have said here previously, it is sometimes essential in order for the rule of law to prevail. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:40 am by Christine Corcos
During their glorious argument, these women worked for civil right champions the Mexican American Legal Defense Educational Fund (“MALDEF”), for Stanford Law School, while others were in private practice and in the government. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:37 am by JB
A number of U.S. law reviews, including the Harvard Law Review, Yale Law Journal, Stanford Law Review, University of Chicago Law Review, Boston University Law Review, Minnesota Law Review, and William and Mary Law Review, have decided to end the practice of "exploding offers" and commit to give every author seven days to respond to an offer of publication.April 19, 2011To the legal community:In recent years,… [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:45 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
This echos a 2007 Stanford Law Review article by Lemley and Doug Lichtman, and Lichtman makes the same point in a (tritely titled) New York Times op-ed. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
Yu.Des Moines, Iowa : Drake University Law School, c2008. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:19 pm by Lawrence Solum
Is consent a mental state or a communicative action? [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 2:47 pm by jak4
Relying on socio-psychological literature and communication theories concerning complexity, categorization, and stereotyping, this Article examines the dynamic dimension of databases. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 12:22 pm by Irene Calboli
Neukom Professor of Law at Stanford Law School, the Director of the Stanford Program in Law, Science and Technology, and a founding partner of Durie Tangri LLP, delivered the Distinguished Annual Hon. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Mozilla and Stanford submitted another proposal to IETF on do not track headers. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm by Mary Minow
Minow: What's your assessment of these changes with regards to the big picture of copyright law, especially as it affects the higher education community? [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:55 pm by Sean Hecht
(Disclosure: I have represented Communities for a Better Environment through my law clinic on various matters. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:23 am by Dave Hoffman
  He is a graduate of Stanford (A.B.), Chicago (J.D.), and Northwestern (Ph.D.). [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 1:05 pm by Stefanie Levine
 Briefing Microsoft v. i4i: Amicus Briefs Supporting Easier Invalidation of Patents in Court (Stanford Law School Blog) 10. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:12 am by Susan Schneider
I was pleased to receive information on some of the exciting agricultural and food law activities at Stanford Law School from Professor Jay Mitchell. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:59 am
"International Legal Theory Interest Group: Harmony and Dissonance in International Legal Theory": IntLawGrrls guest/alumna Nienke Grossman and Helen Stacy (Stanford). ? [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:16 pm by Bruce Ackerman
(updated below)Yochai Benkler and I invite members of the academic legal community to join us in signing the following statement, asking the Administration either publicly to justify, or end, the humiliation and mistreatment of Private Bradley Manning, the suspected whistleblower who is said to have leaked classified government documents to Wikileaks.For background, you can read this editorial in today’s New York Times, The Abuse of Private Manning and get more details from Soldier in… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 3:17 pm by Jeralyn
The The ACLU represented Amadou Diouf, along with the ACLU of Southern California and the Stanford Law School Immigrants' Rights Clinic, says: [read post]
The ACLU, ACLU of Southern California, and Stanford Law School Immigrants' Rights Clinic brought the case on behalf of Amadou Lamine Diouf, a man held in detention for nearly two years while fighting his immigration case even though he posed no danger or flight risk. [read post]