Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States" Results 1901 - 1920 of 3,526
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2013, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Article 6 of the Civil Rights Law provides a formal procedure for changing a name, which provides the advantages of being speedy, definite and a matter of record as was done in Smith v United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 12:00 pm by Gerry W. Beyer
Corp., the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey held that the Stored Communications Act (SCA) protects private Facebook wall posts from unauthorized user access. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 4:20 pm by Lindsay Burke
Ehling was later terminated for attendance reasons, and she brought suit alleging invasion of privacy under New Jersey state law as well as violations of the SCA, among other claims. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm by Theodore Ruger
 Governor Chris Christie in New Jersey, for instance, has agreed to accept the Medicaid expansion through executive order rather than state statute (he vetoed one such bill) thus keeping the leverage to rescind or modify New Jersey’s acceptance firmly in his own hands rather than state legislative control. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 5:13 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Relying on United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Supreme Court handed down its opinion in McIntyre, holding that, because a machinery manufacturer never engaged in activities in New Jersey with the intent to invoke or benefit from the protection of the State’s laws, New Jersey lacked personal jurisdiction over the company under the Due Process Clause. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
That was the question that was asked of the New Jersey Supreme Court in Emma v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am by Thornhill Law Firm, A PLC
The even bigger problem is that Congress has treated insurance as a sacred cow since 1945, when the federal government overruled the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 11:28 am by Michael B. Stack
  Read more…       Despite State Court Order, NJ Federal Court Finds Plaintiff Responsible for Conditional Payments   On June 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey published its opinion in Taransky v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:36 am by Ron Coleman
 Not that this is anything but a lovely garden spot in central New Jersey, for it is that. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:47 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In November 2009, Petitioner traveled to the United States with Respondent and Ana on tourist visas to visit Respondent's father and stepmother in Newark, New Jersey. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:29 am by Frank Crivelli
Since the decision in Richardson v PFRS, 192 N.J 189 (2007), public officials across the State of New Jersey have complained that the award of accidental and ordinary disability pensions have been on the rise. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:08 am
.: 3-15407Case filed: August 6, 2013Qualifying judgment/order: August 6, 2013 8/6/2013 11/4/2013 2013-63 William Graulich, IV and iVest International Holdings, Inc.Case number: 09-cv-4355 (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey)Case filed: August 26, 2009Qualifying judgment/order: June 19,… [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:11 am by Daniel P. Hart
With its international platform and offices in the United States, United Kingdom, China, and Australia, Seyfarth Shaw’s experienced team of lawyers assists companies with large multi-jurisdictional employment law projects of a strategic, compliance and transactional nature, including issues involving noncompetes and trade secrets. [read post]