Search for: "State v. Brain " Results 1901 - 1920 of 2,675
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2011, 6:56 am
physical status in 6 levels: ASA PS I - Normal healthy patient; ASA PS II - Patient with mild systemic disease; ASA PS III - Patient with severe systemic disease; ASA PS IV - Patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life; ASA PS V - Moribund patient who is not expected to survive without the operation; and ASA PS VI - Declared brain-dead patient whose organs are being removed for donor purposes. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:56 am
physical status in 6 levels: ASA PS I - Normal healthy patient; ASA PS II - Patient with mild systemic disease; ASA PS III - Patient with severe systemic disease; ASA PS IV - Patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life; ASA PS V - Moribund patient who is not expected to survive without the operation; and ASA PS VI - Declared brain-dead patient whose organs are being removed for donor purposes. [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:29 pm by Andrew Barovick
Another development being closely watched by medical malpractice lawyers on both sides of the aisle is legislation that may overturn the Arons v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:47 pm by Kurt Holzer
He suffered various injuries including a closed head injury that caused permanent brain damage and a loss of memory. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Aaron Pelley
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/839921.opn.pdf State v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 12:08 pm by George M. Wallace
The legal humor blog Big Legal Brain and [non-defendant at this stage] C. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
16 May 2011, 6:49 am by Sasha Volokh
Environmental economists have a couple of theoretical answers—“[c]ompensating [v]ariation” or “[e]quivalent [v]ariation. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:56 am by David Oscar Markus
We hold that the state court’s rejection of Ferrell’s ineffective-assistance claims was an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:36 am by Charon QC
A recent Telegraph article on Asbestos claims arising from a landmark legal decision of Sienkiewicz v Greif and Knowsley MBC v Willmore is a case in point. [read post]