Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 1901 - 1920 of 15,315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A person described in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b), or paragraph (c), or paragraph (d), or paragraph (e) of this subdivision shall not be removed or otherwise subjected to any disciplinary penalty provided in this section except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon stated charges pursuant to this section. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A person described in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b), or paragraph (c), or paragraph (d), or paragraph (e) of this subdivision shall not be removed or otherwise subjected to any disciplinary penalty provided in this section except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon stated charges pursuant to this section. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
There is some authority on this point from the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:54 am by R. David Donoghue
P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss counterclaim plaintiff Wal-Mart's Lanham Act and related state law declaratory judgment claims related to Smiley Company's potential use of Wal-Mart's Mr. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  But this doesn’t help, b/c then we need to know what’s necessary. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 7:13 am
Stanford student Daniel Matro discusses last Wednesday’s oral argument in Corley v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm by Matthew Kahn
(e)  The Department of Homeland Security evaluated each country against the baseline described in subsection (c) of this section. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 28 January, the Supreme Court will hear the case of CPRE Kent v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Second, A and B v Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority and Anor. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:42 pm
The question is where the will contest to be settled between C and D, would it be appropriate to wipe out the estate in legal fees and thus extinguish B's bequest of $75,000? [read post]