Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 29,271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2011, 5:51 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 1002 provides that To prove the content of a writing, recording, or photograph, the original writing, recording, or photograph is required, except as otherwise provided in these rules or by Act of Congress. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 12:37 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:35 pm
Under the presumption against extraterritoriality established by Supreme Court precedent, legislation does not apply extraterritorially unless Congress clearly states or intends otherwise. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:35 pm
Under the presumption against extraterritoriality established by Supreme Court precedent, legislation does not apply extraterritorially unless Congress clearly states or intends otherwise. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:27 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on Monday, July 26, 2010, in State of North Carolina v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 2:52 am
There, of course, Justice Holmes wrote for the Supreme Court, holding that Congress could enact legislation otherwise beyond its constitutional authority, in furtherance of a duly-enacted treaty obligation. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:26 pm
The Question Presented is: Section 704(B) of Title 18, United States Code, makes it a crime when anyone “falsely represents himself or herself, *** verbally or in writing, to have been awarded any decoaration or medal authorized by Congress for the Armed Forces of the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 1:12 pm
” McNeil v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am
Photo courtesy of Samantha Barbas.Actual Malice tells the full story of New York Times v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 6:28 am
Montize v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 10:13 am
Relying on language in Eldred v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 10:44 am
BOSTOCK v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:30 pm
The case of S.E.C. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:14 am
McKee (Tribal Courts; Water Rights) United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:21 am
Moreover, any effort to enforce a subpoena issued to a federal agency is considered process against the United States; yet the United States is immune from suit unless Congress consents for the United States to be sued. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 5:37 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 8:45 am
Blog posts:Sanctuary Policies, Immigration, and Public Safety (Border Criminologies Blog, Jan. 2021) [text] Through the Looking Glass, Darkly: The Supreme Court’s Muslim Travel Ban Decision (Just Security Blog, Jan. 2021) [text]US: Newly Released Files Show Fast-Track to Deportation (Human Rights Watch, Jan. 2020) [text]Reports:Brief of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees before the Supreme Court of the United States in the case Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary of Homeland… [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
Congress reenacted the formula based on 40-year-old facts with no logical relation to the present day.The post Shelby County v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
United States decision, “the constitutional question is whether Congress has supplied an intelligible principle to guide the delegee’s use of discretion. [read post]
