Search for: "State v. Davis"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 5,691
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
The Supreme Court recently handed down its judgment in the case of Eclairs Group Ltd v JKX Oil & Gas Plc [2015] UKSC 71 (read our Case Preview here). [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:12 am
Florida United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
And in situations like these, the Supreme Court has held, in a somewhat well-known 1977 case, Marks v. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 5:25 am
" [Serafin v Serafin, 401 Mich 629, 635-636; 258 NW2d 461 (1977), quoting the Texas Court of Civil Appeals in Davis v Davis, 507 SW2d 841, 847 (Tex Civ App, 1974).] [read post]
31 May 2013, 11:25 am
Court of Federal Claims in Davis Boat Works, Inc., v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 10:28 pm
Explaining his departure, Colonel Davis stated, "I concluded that full, fair and open trials were not possible under the current system. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
Sarver v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
After Dillon v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 9:34 am
Gibson v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 5:43 am
As the site also notes, a “warrant is not required because the state, in legally impounding the vehicle, bears legal liability for the contents of the vehicle. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 9:28 am
Sinai v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 3:58 am
Although the employee's petition seeking to annul the Commissioner's action was dismissed by State Supreme Court Justice William Davis, the Appellate Division reversed Justice Davis' decision “on the law. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 11:28 am
More from Overlawyered and Wendy Davis. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:51 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm
" State v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:09 pm
" Davis v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (2015) and Rucho v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
That is why the Supreme Court’s failure to make clear the standard of review it was applying in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Again, focusing just on the existing USNWR “top 50” for now:POTENTIAL LOSERS, PEER CHANGE:UC-Irvine (20 v. 37)Washington (36 v. 49)Colorado (36 v. 49)UC-Davis (24 v. 37)Wisconsin (31 v. 43)Boston College (27 v. 37)Emory (20 v. 30)There are a few others in the middle of some interest, because near the top smaller variations matter more. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Again, focusing just on the existing USNWR “top 50” for now:POTENTIAL LOSERS, PEER CHANGE:UC-Irvine (20 v. 37)Washington (36 v. 49)Colorado (36 v. 49)UC-Davis (24 v. 37)Wisconsin (31 v. 43)Boston College (27 v. 37)Emory (20 v. 30)There are a few others in the middle of some interest, because near the top smaller variations matter more. [read post]
