Search for: "State v. District Court (Brown)"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 3,172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Brown, and George P. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Brown. [read post]
7 May 2010, 6:05 am
District Court for the District of Arizona 2008). [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 8:59 am
The Defendants state that the Agreement was "intentionally not docketed. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:08 am
Kennedy authored the second, United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
This practice did not end until well after the Supreme Court struck down race-based school segregation in Brown v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:59 pm
LEXIS 15353 (11th Cir 7/17/2010) Remand from the Supreme Court and panel remands to the district court in light of Holland v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court said in Karcher v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 8:27 pm
Since the last edition, Holly Wood was killed by the State of Alabama and Cal Brown by the State of Washington. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm
United States, Thomas v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 10:08 pm
DL v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:53 pm
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 9:08 am
App 13 (1987), State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 9:08 am
App 13 (1987), State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 3:05 pm
(see Jones v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 1:20 am
” Plaintiffs Alaska Oil and Gas Association (“AOGA”), the State of Alaska, and North Slope Borough (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed separate lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Alaska challenging the listing decision. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
It is named after the Supreme Court’s 1984 opinion in Chevron v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 10:08 am
This is the very point of the plain-error standardâ€"it “serves powerful institutional interests, including securing the role of the United States District Court as the court of first instance. [read post]
